首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Is Injection Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence Dead? Yes
【24h】

Is Injection Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence Dead? Yes

机译:压力性尿失禁的注射疗法会死吗?是

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Urethral bulking agents were first developed in the early 1970s and refined in an age before mid-urethral slings as a less-invasive therapy for female stress urinary incontinence. At their inception, the only alternative therapies available to women were either vastly more invasive, as in the case of open culposuspension and autologous fas-cial sling, or of questionable durability, as in the case of vaginal needle suspensions. Secondary to the ease in placement and perceived low rates of complication, this type of therapy persisted and continued to evolve, despite the known deficiencies in efficacy and durability.1'3 However, since the introduction by Ulmsten in 19954 of the transvaginal tape (TVT) procedure, a true alternative to more invasive procedures has evolved. Modern mid-urethral slings not only have low complication rates, but also equal rates of efficacy compared with previous standards of therapy that bulking agents have aspired to but never achieved. The TVT is considered by some to be the new reference standard of therapy for stress urinary incontinence and, in assuming that role, has obviated the need for injectable therapy
机译:尿道填充剂最早是在1970年代初开发的,并在尿道中段吊带之前的某个年龄进行了改良,作为一种针对女性压力性尿失禁的微创疗法。从一开始,妇女可以使用的唯一替代疗法要么是更具侵入性的疗法(例如开放式阴茎悬吊术和自体筋膜悬带),要么是持久性有问题的(例如阴道针悬吊术)。继放置的便利性和低的并发症发生率之后,尽管在功效和耐用性方面存在已知的缺陷,但这种类型的治疗仍持续并继续发展。1'3然而,自从1995年Ulmsten引入经阴道带(TVT) )手术,已经发展出了一种更具侵入性的手术的真正替代方案。现代的尿道中吊带不仅并发症率低,而且与填充剂一直追求但从未实现的以前的治疗标准相比,疗效相同。 TVT被某些人认为是压力性尿失禁治疗的新参考标准,并且在担任这一职务后,就不再需要注射疗法了

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号