首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Is robotic radical cystectomy an appropriate treatment for bladder cancer? Short-term oncologic and clinical follow-up in 50 consecutive patients.
【24h】

Is robotic radical cystectomy an appropriate treatment for bladder cancer? Short-term oncologic and clinical follow-up in 50 consecutive patients.

机译:机器人根治性膀胱切除术是否适合治疗膀胱癌?连续50例患者的短期肿瘤和临床随访。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Recent case series have now been reported for robotic cystectomy. Despite the novelty of these approaches, few reports have been published on the oncologic and clinical outcomes, even in the short term. We report the oncologic and short-term clinical outcomes of 50 patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. METHODS: A total of 50 patients underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and extracorporeal urinary diversion for bladder cancer. The outcome measures included the pathologic outcomes, complication rate, timing of adjuvant chemotherapy, disease recurrence, and overall and disease-specific survival. RESULTS: Robotic cystectomy was performed in 40 men and 10 women at a mean age of 63.6 years. Of the 50 patients, 66% had Stage pT2 or less, 14% had pT3 disease, and 20% Stage N+ disease. No patient had positive surgical margins. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 19 (range 8-37). The mean clinical follow-up was 13.2 months. Seven patients had evidence of recurrent disease. Three patients died of advanced urothelial carcinoma, and two died of other causes. Longer term complications included stomal hernia in 2 and partial ureteral obstruction in 1. Eleven patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage pT3 disease and N+ disease at a mean of 7.2 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and oncologic follow-up of patients undergoing robotic radical cystectomy appears to be favorable in the short term. As our follow-up increases, we should expect to continue to truly define the long-term clinical appropriateness and oncologic success of this procedure.
机译:目的:目前已经报道了机器人膀胱切除术的最新病例系列。尽管这些方法具有新颖性,但即使在短期内,也几乎没有关于肿瘤和临床结果的报道。我们报告了50例接受了机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的患者的肿瘤学和短期临床结果。方法:共有50例患者接受了机器人辅助的腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术和体外尿路转移治疗膀胱癌。结果指标包括病理结果,并发症发生率,辅助化疗的时机,疾病复发以及总体生存率和疾病特异性生存率。结果:机器人膀胱切除术在40名男性和10名女性中进行,平均年龄为63.6岁。在50例患者中,有66%的患者患有pT2期或以下,有14%的患者患有pT3疾病,有20%的患者患有N +期疾病。没有患者的手术切缘阳性。切除的淋巴结平均数为19(范围8-37)。平均临床随访时间为13.2个月。七名患者有复发疾病的证据。 3例患者死于晚期尿路上皮癌,2例患者死于其他原因。长期并发症包括2例有气孔疝和1例部分输尿管阻塞。11例患者在术后7.2周平均接受了pT3期和N +期辅助化疗。结论:短期内机器人根治性膀胱切除术患者的临床和肿瘤学随访似乎是有利的。随着随访的增加,我们应该期望继续真正确定该手术的长期临床适用性和肿瘤学成功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号