...
首页> 外文期刊>Urban Forestry & Urban Greening >Community gardening and governance over urban nature in New Orleans's Lower Ninth Ward
【24h】

Community gardening and governance over urban nature in New Orleans's Lower Ninth Ward

机译:新奥尔良下第九区的社区园艺和城市自然治理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Lefebvre's right to the city (RTTC) framework argues for a renewed politics of inhabitance in cities, which enfranchises urban residents to imagine and create urban space to meet their needs. Another theoretical framework, Urban Political Ecology (UPE) works to "untangle the interconnected economic, political, social, and ecological processes that go together to form highly uneven and deeply unjust urban landscapes" (Swyngedouw and Heynen, 2003. Antipode, 35 (5): 898). In this paper, I draw connections between the RTTC framework and literature in Urban Political Ecology (UPE) to consider how their intersection can inform analysis of grassroots urban agriculture initiatives in the Lower Ninth Ward Neighborhood of New Orleans. I argue that community efforts to transform vacant lots into productive gardens and food forests constitute a specific form of claims on the right to the city, and on the right to alter and improve urban ecology. These claims play out at the scale of the neighborhood, rather than that of the city, and are manifested within specific urban sites managed by residents of a particular neighborhood. I characterize specific, neighborhood-scale urban greening efforts as "political moments" (Becher, 2012. Political moments with long-term consequences. In: Smith, Michael Peter, McQuarrie, Michael (Eds.), Remaking Urban Citizenship: Organizations, Institutions, and the Right to the City. New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers, pp. 203-220), which, despite their locational and topical specificity,. offer profound potential for broader urban social change. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译:勒菲弗尔(Lefebvre)的城市权利(RTTC)框架要求重新制定城市居民政治,这赋予了城市居民幻想和创造满足其需求的城市空间的权利。另一个理论框架,城市政治生态学(UPE)旨在“弄清相互联系的经济,政治,社会和生态过程,这些过程共同构成高度不平衡和极为不公正的城市景观”(Swyngedouw和Heynen,2003年。Antipode,35(5) ):898)。在本文中,我将RTTC框架与城市政治生态学(UPE)中的文献联系起来,以考虑它们的交集如何为新奥尔良下第九区居民区的基层城市农业计划分析提供信息。我认为,社区为将闲置土地转变为生产性花园和食用森林而做出的努力构成了对城市权以及对改变和改善城市生态权的要求的一种特定形式。这些主张在社区而不是城市的规模上发挥作用,并体现在特定社区居民管理的特定城市场所内。我将特定的,邻里规模的城市绿化工作描述为“政治时刻”(Becher,2012年。具有长期后果的政治时刻。在:史密斯,迈克尔·彼得,麦夸里,迈克尔(编辑),《重塑城市公民:组织,机构》 ,以及《城市权利》(新泽西州新不伦瑞克省,交易出版商,第203-220页),尽管它们在地理位置和主题上有特殊性。为更广泛的城市社会变革提供深远的潜力。 (C)2016 Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号