首页> 外文期刊>Psychotherapy and psychosomatics >Internet-based guided self-help versus group cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic tinnitus: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Internet-based guided self-help versus group cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic tinnitus: A randomized controlled trial

机译:基于互联网的慢性耳鸣指导自助与集体认知行为治疗:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the effects of conventional face-to-face group cognitive behavioral therapy (GCBT) and an Internet-delivered guided self-help treatment (Internet-based CBT, ICBT) on tinnitus distress. Methods: A total of 128 adults with at least mild levels of chronic tinnitus distress were randomly assigned to GCBT (n = 43), ICBT (n = 41), or a web-based discussion forum (DF) that served as a control condition (n = 44). Standardized self-report measures [the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Mini-Tinnitus Questionnaire (Mini-TQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Insomnia Severity Index and Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire] were completed at the pre- and post-assessments and at the 6-month follow-up. Results: Repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed significant time × group interaction effects on the primary outcomes (THI and Mini-TQ scores) in favor of both CBT interventions compared with the DF at post-assessment (0.56 ≤ g ≤ 0.93; all p ≤ 0.001). There were no significant differences between GCBT and ICBT (all p > 0.05) and the treatment effects remained stable at the 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that ICBT might be an equally effective alternative to conventional CBT in the management of chronic tinnitus. Despite encouraging results, further research is necessary to determine the actual potential of ICBT as a viable alternative to CBT, and under which circumstances it is effective.
机译:背景:这项随机对照试验的目的是研究传统的面对面团体认知行为疗法(GCBT)和互联网提供的指导性自助服务(基于互联网的CBT,ICBT)对耳鸣困扰的影响。方法:将总共128名至少患有轻度慢性耳鸣的成年人随机分配到GCBT(n = 43),ICBT(n = 41)或基于网络的讨论论坛(DF)作为对照条件(n = 44)。在评估前后,以及在6个月的随访。结果:重复测量方差分析显示,在评估后(0.56≤g≤0.93;所有p≤0.001),相比于DF,两种CBT干预对主要结局(THI和Mini-TQ得分)的时间有显着×群体相互作用的影响。 )。 GCBT和ICBT之间无显着差异(所有p> 0.05),并且在6个月的随访中治疗效果保持稳定。结论:这项研究提供了证据,证明ICBT在慢性耳鸣的治疗中可以等效于常规CBT。尽管取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但仍需要进一步研究以确定ICBT作为CBT可行替代品的实际潜力,并在这种情况下有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号