首页> 外文期刊>Psychotherapy and politics international >Alternatives to Adversarial Processes in the Regulation of Professional Ethics
【24h】

Alternatives to Adversarial Processes in the Regulation of Professional Ethics

机译:职业道德规制中对抗程序的替代方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Professional regulatory bodies, including ethics committees, association boards, and government licensing authorities, oversee the ethical behaviour of professionals, specifically monitoring their use of power. A key element of such regulation is the hearing of ethics complaints against practitioners. This generally involves adversarial type processes which attempt to echo the legal system. The use of these adversarial models of investigation and discipline is called into question here and other possibilities are outlined.
机译:专业的监管机构,包括道德委员会,协会委员会和政府许可机构,负责监督专业人员的道德行为,尤其是监视其权力使用情况。该法规的关键要素是听取对从业人员的道德投诉。这通常涉及试图与法律制度相呼应的对抗型过程。这些质疑性的调查和纪律模型的使用在此受到质疑,并概述了其他可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号