...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychotherapy and psychosomatics >Theoretical foundations and clinical implications of formal psychological assessment
【24h】

Theoretical foundations and clinical implications of formal psychological assessment

机译:正式心理评估的理论基础和临床意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The quality of the initial assessment represents one of the predictors of positive therapeutic outcomes, thus an increasing amount of research focuses on the development of more accurate assessment tools [1]. In clinical practice, the most widely adopted tools for assessment are clinical interview, semistructured interviews and psychological testing. Clinicians follow two main criteria in developing the sequence of questions to ask: (1) choosing questions to collect information for both diagnosis and case formulation and (2) trying to reduce redundancy. These criteria are not satisfied by self-report questionnaires because of methodological problems deriving from adopting a psychometric approach in psycho-diagnosis. Since questionnaires mainly provide quantitative information (scores), they are unsuitable for collecting structured qualitative information. Furthermore, psychometric theory emphasizes the importance of obtaining reliable measures even through redundancy [2].
机译:初始评估的质量代表了积极治疗结果的预测指标之一,因此,越来越多的研究集中在开发更准确的评估工具上[1]。在临床实践中,最广泛采用的评估工具是临床访谈,半结构化访谈和心理测试。临床医生在制定提出问题的顺序时遵循两个主要标准:(1)选择问题以收集信息以用于诊断和病例表述;以及(2)尝试减少重复。自我报告调查表无法满足这些标准,因为在心理诊断中采用心理测量方法会产生方法问题。由于问卷主要提供定量信息(分数),因此不适合收集结构化的定性信息。此外,心理计量学理论强调即使通过冗余也要获得可靠措施的重要性[2]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号