首页> 外文期刊>Psychology and psychotherapy: Theory,research and practice >'The vehicle of success': Theoretical and empirical perspectives on the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and psychiatry.
【24h】

'The vehicle of success': Theoretical and empirical perspectives on the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and psychiatry.

机译:“成功的载体”:关于心理治疗和精神病学治疗联盟的理论和经验观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The importance of the 'therapeutic alliance' has long been recognized in psychotherapeutic theory and research, but is also increasingly researched in psychiatry. This paper examines the clinical and empirical literature on the alliance and asks, first, whether the concept is unrecognizably distorted when it travels from the psychoanalytic context to other therapies and to psychiatry, or when translated into research instruments; and, second, how we are to understand the apparent anomaly whereby its proponents have defined it as a 'vehicle' for treatment rather than curative, whereas quantitative research increasingly associates it with outcome. This paper reviews the evolution of the concept in clinical theory, traces the development of empirical research on the subject and considers its use in psychiatry. It argues that the empirical research misleadingly suggests a curative paradigm, and that it may be unable to illuminate some of the clinical controversies, although its implications for theory demand consideration. It argues for the retention of the alliance concept in psychiatry distinct from the broader spectrum of the 'relationship'. Finally, it argues that the debate about the concept's curative properties may, paradoxically, be more pressing within psychotherapy than psychiatry, and endorses calls for more theoretically driven empirical research into the alliance.
机译:长期以来,“治疗联盟”的重要性已在心理治疗理论和研究中得到认可,但在精神病学领域也越来越受到研究。本文研究了有关该联盟的临床和经验文献,并首先询问,当该概念从精神分析环境转向其他疗法和精神病学,或转化为研究工具时,该概念是否会被不可识别地扭曲?其次,我们如何理解表观异常,据此异常的支持者将其定义为治疗的“工具”,而不是治疗的方法,而定量研究越来越将其与结果联系起来。本文回顾了该概念在临床理论中的演变,追踪了该主题的实证研究的发展,并考虑了其在精神病学中的应用。它认为,经验研究误导了一种治疗范例,尽管它对理论的影响需要考虑,但它可能无法阐明某些临床争议。它主张将同盟概念保留在精神病学中,这不同于“关系”的更广泛范围。最后,它认为,关于该概念的治疗性质的争论可能在精神疗法方面比精神病学更为紧迫,这自相矛盾的是,并且赞同对联盟进行理论上更深入的实证研究的呼吁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号