首页> 外文期刊>Psychology and psychotherapy: Theory,research and practice >Comparison of self-rated and clinician-rated measures of depressive symptoms: a naturalistic study.
【24h】

Comparison of self-rated and clinician-rated measures of depressive symptoms: a naturalistic study.

机译:自我评估和临床评估抑郁症状的比较:一项自然研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to assess the concordance between self-rating and clinician's assessment tools of depression, as well as factors involved in the differences between auto and hetero evaluation, 198 depressed in-patients were assessed at admission and at discharge using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (10-item version, MADRS) and the self-rating scale Symptoms CheckList (90-item version, SCL-90). We found that about 18% of patients overestimated and about 15% underestimated their depressive symptomatology (SCL-90 depression subscale) relative to the psychiatrist's assessment. Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of personality disorders and previous history of psychiatric disorders predicted the overestimating group. Discriminant analysis showed that approximately 75% of participants were correctly classified when previous history of psychiatric disorders, presence of personality disorders and age were entered separately into the equation.
机译:为了评估自我评估与临床抑郁评估工具之间的一致性,以及自动评估与异质评估之间的差异所涉及的因素,使用蒙哥马利·阿斯伯格抑郁评估量表对198名抑郁住院患者进行了评估。 (10个项目的版本,MADRS)和自评量表症状检查清单(90个项目的版本,SCL-90)。我们发现,相对于精神科医生的评估,大约18%的患者高估了他们的抑郁症状(SCL-90抑郁量表)。 Logistic回归分析表明,人格障碍的存在和以前的精神病史预示了高估人群。判别分析表明,将先前的精神病史,人格障碍的存在和年龄分别输入等式时,大约75%的参与者已正确分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号