首页> 外文期刊>Quintessence international >Clinical and CBCT-based diagnosis of furcation involvement in patients with severe periodontitis
【24h】

Clinical and CBCT-based diagnosis of furcation involvement in patients with severe periodontitis

机译:重度牙周炎患者分叉受累的临床和基于CBCT的诊断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the use of periodontal probing and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in the diagnosis of furcation involvement (FI) in patients with chronic generalized severe periodontitis. Method and Materials: Fifteen patients with chronic generalized severe periodontitis were included in this study. In total, 174 furcation sites (all in molar teeth) were analyzed. FI was assessed at three sites (buccal, mesiopalatal, and distopalatal) of maxillary molars, and at two sites (buccal and oral) of mandibular molars. FI was assessed both clinically (periodontal probing) and on CBCT images, using a dichotomous scale (present/absent). The agreement between clinical and CBCT-based findings was calculated. Results: FI were more often detected by means of CBCT than by means of clinical examination. Agreement between the evaluation methods was present in 46.9% of cases (63.3% in maxilla, 45.0% in mandible). FI detected clinically was confirmed by means of CBCT in 24% of the evaluated sites. The largest agreement (73.7%) in FI detection was found in the distopalatal maxillary sites between CBCT and clinical probing. The smallest agreement (36.6%) was found in the buccal sites of the mandibular molars, in which 63.3% of FI were detected using CBCT only, but not clinically. Conclusion: The number of FI detected by means of CBCT was larger than by means of periodontal probing. In those cases in which chronic generalized severe periodontitis is clinically diagnosed, and surgical treatment is necessary, CBCT may be suggested as an adjunct tool for FI assessment.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较牙周探测和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像在诊断慢性全身性严重牙周炎患者分叉受累(FI)中的应用。方法和材料:本研究纳入了15例慢性全身性严重牙周炎患者。总共分析了174个分叉部位(全部在臼齿中)。在上颌磨牙的三个部位(颊,中叶和足底)和下颌磨牙的两个部位(颊和口腔)评估FI。使用二分法量表(存在/不存在)在临床(牙周探测)和CBCT图像上评估FI。计算出基于临床和基于CBCT的发现之间的一致性。结果:通过CBCT检测FI的频率要高于临床检查。在46.9%的病例中评估方法之间存在一致性(上颌骨63.3%,下颌骨45.0%)。通过CBCT在24%的评估部位证实了临床检测到的FI。在FI检测中,在CBCT和临床探查之间的上睑上颌部位发现的一致性最高(73.7%)。在下颌磨牙的颊位发现最小的一致性(36.6%),其中仅使用CBCT检测到了63.3%的FI,但在临床上未检测到。结论:通过CBCT检测的FI数量大于通过牙周探测的FI数量。在临床上诊断出慢性全身性严重牙周炎且需要手术治疗的情况下,建议使用CBCT作为FI评估的辅助工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号