...
首页> 外文期刊>Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology >Asking sensitive questions: the impact of forgiving wording and question context on social desirability bias
【24h】

Asking sensitive questions: the impact of forgiving wording and question context on social desirability bias

机译:提出敏感问题:宽容的措辞和问题背景对社会期望偏差的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Sensitive questions are prone to systematic measurement error due to the respondents' social desirability concerns. Literature on empirical social research often recommends either positive "loading" of sensitive questions, e.g. using "forgiving" wording, or manipulating the question context to reduce social desirability bias. We derive theoretical explanations of how manipulations of question wording and context could elicit more socially undesirable answers in sensitive surveys. In an experimental online survey (N velence 1, 176), we evaluate the effects of (1) forgiving wording and (2) question context on social desirability bias in different sensitive questions. The empirical evidence on the assumed bias-reducing effects shows inconsistent results. It is indicated however, that the perceived social norm has the strongest and most consistent effect on the respondents' propensity to self-report socially undesirable behavior.
机译:由于受访者的社会可取性问题,敏感性问题容易导致系统的测量误差。关于经验社会研究的文献通常建议对敏感问题进行积极的“装载”,例如使用“宽容”的措辞,或操纵问题的语境以减少社会的期望偏差。我们从理论上解释了如何对问题的措词和上下文进行操纵会在敏感的调查中引发更多的社会不良答案。在一项在线实验研究中(N velence 1,176),我们评估了(1)宽容的措辞和(2)问题情境对不同敏感问题中社会期望偏差的影响。关于假定的减少偏见效果的经验证据表明结果不一致。但是,指出的是,所感知的社会规范对受访者自我报告社交不良行为的倾向具有最强和最一致的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号