首页> 外文期刊>Psychosis >Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis: rationale and protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis: rationale and protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:精神病的认知行为疗法:系统评价和荟萃分析的原理和方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a recommended treatment for people with psychosis, with meta-analyses showing important benefits when compared to treatment as usual (TAU). However, there has been growing debate as to whether CBT has specific benefits over and above those attributable to less intensive psychosocial interventions, such as befriending and supportive counselling. Recent meta-analyses examining this question have suffered from various difficulties including potential bias and error. After detailing these problems, we present a protocol for a new review. Methods and design: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE, previous reviews and online trial registers will be systematically searched for randomised trials examining the efficacy and safety of CBT for psychosis, when compared to (a) TAU and (b) other psychosocial treatments. Primary outcomes are symptomatic change and numbers achieving clinically significant improvement. Secondary outcomes include adverse effects, change in target complaint, subjectively defined recovery and relapse. Discussion: This review will provide service users, relatives and policy-makers with a comprehensive and up-to-date assessment of the efficacy and safety of CBT for psychosis. Advance publication and peer-review of hypotheses and methods should maximise transparency, enhancing the reliability and quality of the findings.
机译:背景:认知行为疗法(CBT)是精神病患者的推荐治疗方法,与常规治疗(TAU)相比,荟萃分析显示出重要的益处。但是,关于CBT是否具有比不那么密集的社会心理干预(例如,友善和支持性咨询)更大的益处的争论越来越多。最近研究该问题的荟萃分析遭受了各种困难,包括潜在的偏见和错误。详细说明了这些问题之后,我们提出了一个用于新审查的协议。方法和设计:与(a)TAU和TAU相比,将系统地搜索Cochrane对照试验中央注册系统(CENTRAL),PubMed,EMBASE,以前的评论和在线试验注册系统,以研究检验CBT治疗精神病的有效性和安全性的随机试验。 (b)其他社会心理治疗。主要结果是有症状的改变和达到临床显着改善的数字。次要结果包括不良反应,目标投诉的变化,主观定义的恢复和复发。讨论:该审查将为服务使用者,亲戚和政策制定者提供有关CBT治疗精神病的功效和安全性的全面,最新评估。提前发表假设和方法的同行评议应该最大程度地提高透明度,从而提高调查结果的可靠性和质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号