...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychopharmacology >Working memory, executive processes and the effects of alcohol on Go/No-Go learning: testing a model of behavioral regulation and impulsivity.
【24h】

Working memory, executive processes and the effects of alcohol on Go/No-Go learning: testing a model of behavioral regulation and impulsivity.

机译:工作记忆,执行过程以及酒精对“通过/不通过”学习的影响:测试行为调节和冲动的模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

RATIONALE: Impulsivity is associated with increased risk for alcoholism. Alcohol also may increase impulsive behavior, although little is known about the processes underlying this effect. OBJECTIVES: This study tested a model proposing that the executive processes of working memory (WM) and conditional associative learning (CAL) modulate behavioral inhibition. Subjects had either a positive (FHP) or a negative (FHN) family history of alcoholism. Hypotheses were that alcohol would increase Go/No-Go impulsive responding but only in subjects with low working memory capacity (low-WM), low-CAL ability, or FHP for alcoholism. The model also predicted that WM and CAL modulate inhibitory responses to contingency reversal on a Go/No-Go task. METHODS: A Go/No-Go learning task with a midway contingency reversal was administered to 71 FHP and 78 FHN subjects when sober and after drinking one of two moderate doses of alcohol. WM (digits backward) and CAL (conditional spatial association task) were also assessed when sober. RESULTS: Alcohol resulted in more false alarms but only in low-WM subjects. Both WM and CAL modulated learning to inhibit behavior after contingency reversal, suggesting separate modulation mechanisms for WM and CAL. Subjects with low- capacity WM and subjects with low-capacity CAL ability had more difficulty learning response inhibition after contingency reversal. FHPs and FHNs did not differ in their response to alcohol. CONCLUSIONS: The results support our model of the modulatory role of WM and CAL in the ongoing regulation of behavioral inhibitory systems. The results also suggest that individuals with low capacity WM are more susceptible to alcohol's effect of increasing impulsive behavior, suggesting that alcohol reduces the capacity of working memory to modulate response inhibition.
机译:理由:冲动会增加酗酒的风险。酒精也可能增加冲动行为,尽管对该作用的潜在过程知之甚少。目的:本研究测试了一个模型,该模型提出工作记忆(WM)和条件联想学习(CAL)的执行过程可调节行为抑制。受试者有酗酒的阳性(FHP)或阴性(FHN)家族史。假设是酒精会增加“ Go / No-Go”冲动反应,但仅适用于工作记忆能力低(WM低),CAL能力低或酒精中毒的FHP的受试者。该模型还预测,WM和CAL会在执行/不执行任务时调节对意外事故冲动的抑制响应。方法:71名FHP和78名FHN受试者在清醒时和饮用两种中等剂量的酒精之一后,进行了Go / No-Go学习任务,同时进行了中性意外事件冲销。清醒时还评估了WM(后退数字)和CAL(有条件空间关联任务)。结果:酒精导致更多的误报,但仅在低WM受试者中。 WM和CAL都通过调制学习来抑制意外情况发生后的行为,这表明WM和CAL具有单独的调制机制。具有低能力WM的受试者和具有低能力CAL能力的受试者在事后逆转后学习抑制反应的困难更大。 FHP和FHN对酒精的反应没有差异。结论:结果支持我们的WM和CAL在行为抑制系统的持续调节中的调节作用模型。结果还表明,具有低WM能力的个体更容易受到酒精增加的冲动行为的影响,这表明酒精会降低工作记忆调节反应抑制的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号