首页> 外文期刊>Psychological assessment >Measuring Treatment Differentiation for Implementation Research: The Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy Revised Strategies Scale
【24h】

Measuring Treatment Differentiation for Implementation Research: The Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy Revised Strategies Scale

机译:测量治疗差异以进行实施研究:儿童心理治疗的治疗过程观察性编码系统修订策略量表

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Observational measures to assess implementation integrity (the extent to which components of an evidence-based treatment are delivered as intended) are needed. The authors evaluated the reliability of the scores and the validity of the score interpretations for the Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy-Revised Strategies scale (TPOCS-RS; McLeod, 2010) and assessed the potential of the TPOCS-RS to assess treatment differentiation, a component of implementation integrity. The TPOCS-RS includes 5 theory-based subscales (Cognitive, Behavioral, Psychodynamic, Client-Centered, and Family). Using the TPOCS-RS, coders independently rated 954 sessions conducted with 89 children (M age = 10.56, SD = 2.00; age 7-15 years; 65.20% White) diagnosed with a primary anxiety disorder who received different treatments (manual-based vs. nonmanualized) across settings (research vs. practice). Coders produced reliable ratings at the item level (M intraclass correlation coefficient = .76, SD = .18). Analyses support the construct validity of the Cognitive and Behavioral subscale scores and, to a lesser extent, the Psychodynamic, Family, and Client-Centered subscale scores. Correlations among the TPOCS-RS subscale scores and between the TPOCS-RS subscale scores and observational ratings of the alliance and client involvement were moderate suggesting independence of the subscale scores. Moreover, the TPOCS-RS showed promise for assessing implementation integrity as the TPOCS-RS subscale scores, as hypothesized, discriminated between manual-guided treatment delivered across research and practice settings and nonmanualized usual care. The findings support the potential of the TPOCS-RS Cognitive and Behavioral subscales to assess treatment differentiation in implementation research. Results for the remaining subscales are promising, although further research is needed.
机译:需要采取观察性措施来评估实施的完整性(按预期方式提供循证治疗的组成部分的程度)。作者评估了儿童心理治疗修订策略量表的治疗过程观察性编码系统的得分的可靠性和得分解释的有效性(TPOCS-RS; McLeod,2010),并评估了TPOCS-RS评估治疗的潜力差异化,是实施完整性的组成部分。 TPOCS-RS包括5个基于理论的分量表(认知,行为,心理动力,以客户为中心和家庭)。使用TPOCS-RS,编码人员对被诊断患有原发性焦虑症的89名儿童(M年龄= 10.56,SD = 2.00;年龄7-15岁; 65.20%的白人)进行了954次会话独立评估,他们接受了不同的治疗(手动方式与跨设置(研究与实践)。编码人员在项目级别上给出了可靠的评分(M组内相关系数= .76,SD = .18)。分析支持认知和行为子量表分数的构造效度,在较小程度上支持心理动力,家庭和以客户为中心的子量表分数。 TPOCS-RS子量表评分之间以及TPOCS-RS子量表评分与联盟和客户参与的观察等级之间的相关性中等,表明该子量表得分具有独立性。此外,TPOCS-RS表现出有望以TPOCS-RS子量表分数评估实施的完整性,如假设的那样,该分数在研究和实践环境中进行的人工指导治疗与非手动常规护理之间有所区别。这些发现支持TPOCS-RS认知和行为分量表在实施研究中评估治疗差异的潜力。其余子量表的结果是有希望的,尽管还需要进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号