...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological assessment >Executive Function Assessment and Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Tasks Versus Ratings on the Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale
【24h】

Executive Function Assessment and Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Tasks Versus Ratings on the Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale

机译:执行功能评估和成人注意缺陷/多动障碍:任务对执行功能量表对巴克利赤字的评级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) exhibit variable impairments on executive function (EF) tasks. Due to this variability, ratings of EF (rather than tasks) have been proposed as an alternative method that better captures symptom severity and impairment among adults with ADHD. However, few studies have jointly examined performance across multiple neuropsychological domains and EF ratings as predictors of severity and impairment among adults with ADHD. Adults (N = 273) ages 18-38 years (M = 22.6 years, 55.3% male, 62.2% with ADHD) completed a comprehensive diagnostic and neurocognitive assessment, which included self and informant ratings of ADHD symptom severity and EF and tasks of arousal/activation, response inhibition, set shifting, interference control, and working memory. Hierarchical linear regression models indicated that tasks of arousal/activation and response inhibition uniquely predicted ADHD symptom dimensions and related impairments. Over and above EF task performance, EF ratings of time management significantly predicted increased inattention (beta = .209, p < .001, Delta R-2 = 3.9%), whereas ratings of restraint predicted increased hyperactivity/impulsivity (beta = .259, p < .001, Delta R-2 = 6.4%). Furthermore, EF ratings of time management, restraint, and emotion regulation incrementally accounted for variance in relationship, professional, and daily living impairments over and above EF task performance (Delta R-2 range = 1.7-7.7%). Results may help refine neurobiological theories and assessment of adult ADHD.
机译:注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的成年人在执行功能(EF)任务上表现出可变的障碍。由于这种可变性,建议采用EF评分(而非任务评分)作为一种更好的方法来更好地捕获ADHD成人的症状严重程度和损伤。然而,很少有研究联合检查跨多个神经心理学领域的表现和EF评分作为ADHD成人严重程度和损伤的预测指标。成人(N = 273),年龄18-38岁(M = 22.6岁,男性55.3%,ADHD 62.2%)完成了全面的诊断和神经认知评估,其中包括对ADHD症状严重程度和EF的自我和知情评分以及唤醒任务/激活,响应抑制,设置移位,干扰控制和工作记忆。分层线性回归模型表明,唤醒/激活和抑制反应的任务可以唯一预测ADHD症状的大小和相关的障碍。除了EF任务绩效外,时间管理的EF评分显着预测了注意力不集中的情况(β= .209,p <.001,Delta R-2 = 3.9%),而克制的评分则预测了过度活跃/冲动(β= .259)。 ,p <.001,Delta R-2 = 6.4%)。此外,EF在时间管理,约束和情绪调节方面的等级逐渐超过了EF任务绩效(Delta R-2范围= 1.7-7.7%),说明了人际关系,职业和日常生活障碍的差异。结果可能有助于完善神经生物学理论和评估成人多动症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号