首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatric services: a journal of the American Psychiatric Association >False starts in psychotherapy for substance use disorders and PTSD in the VHA
【24h】

False starts in psychotherapy for substance use disorders and PTSD in the VHA

机译:在VHA中针对物质使用障碍和PTSD的心理治疗开创错误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As part of the push toward evidence-based mental health treatment, there is interest in increasing the proportion of patients who engage in evidence-based psychotherapy. However, attrition is a common phenomenon, especially at the beginning of psychotherapy. Using Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data, we examined psychotherapy utilization patterns among patients diagnosed as having a substance use disorder or posttraumatLc stress disorder (PTSD) in fiscal year (FY) 2008. Start of a psychotherapy treatment episode was defined as the first psychotherapy visit after 60 days with no VHA psychotherapy visits within VHA. Thus psychotherapy visits more than 60 days apart were viewed as separate treatment episodes. This is consistent with a widely used definition of a treatment episode for a substance use disorder (1). Among patients who initiated psychotherapy, we also examined attrition-defined as attending only one or two psychotherapy visits.
机译:作为推动循证心理健康治疗的一部分,人们有兴趣增加从事循证心理治疗的患者比例。但是,损耗是一种普遍现象,尤其是在心理治疗开始时。使用退伍军人卫生管理局(VHA)的数据,我们检查了在2008财政年度(FY)被诊断为患有药物使用障碍或创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患者中的心理治疗利用模式。心理治疗的发作定义为首次心理治疗60天后就诊,VHA内未进行VHA心理治疗。因此,相隔60天以上的心理治疗就诊被视为单独的治疗发作。这与针对物质使用障碍的治疗发作的广泛使用定义一致(1)。在发起心理治疗的患者中,我们还检查了定义为仅参加一两次心理治疗就诊的减员情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号