首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect - Theory of mind and moral judgment
【24h】

Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect - Theory of mind and moral judgment

机译:故意行事和副作用-心理理论和道德判断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The concept of acting intentionally is an important nexus where theory of mind and moral judgment meet. Preschool children's judgments of intentional action show a valence-driven asymmetry. Children say that a foreseen but disavowed side effect is brought about "on purpose" when the side effect itself is morally bad, but not when it is morally good. This is the first demonstration in preschoolers that moral judgment influences judgments of whether something was done on purpose (as opposed to judgments of purpose influencing moral judgment). Judgments of intentionality are usually assumed to be purely factual. That these judgments are sometimes partly normative-even in preschoolers-challenges current understanding. Young children's judgments regarding foreseen side effects depend on whether the children process the idea that the character does not care about the side effect. As soon as preschoolers effectively process the theory-of-mind concept "not care that P," children show the side-effect effect.
机译:故意行动的概念是思想理论与道德判断相结合的重要联系。学龄前儿童对故意行为的判断显示出价驱动的不对称性。孩子们说,如果副作用本身在道德上是不好的,而在道德上是好的,则不是“可以预见但被拒绝的副作用”。这是学龄前儿童中的第一个证明,道德判断会影响对是否出于故意而做出的判断(与影响道德判断的目的判断相反)。通常认为故意性判断是纯粹事实性的。即使在学龄前儿童中,这些判断有时仍是部分规范性的挑战当前的理解。幼儿对可预见的副作用的判断取决于幼儿是否处理了角色不关心副作用的想法。学龄前儿童一旦有效处理了心理理论概念“不在乎P”,孩子就会表现出副作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号