首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >The cross-category effect - Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition
【24h】

The cross-category effect - Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition

机译:跨类别效应-仅是社会类别就足以引起人脸识别中的个人偏见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although the cross-race effect (CRE) is a well-established phenomenon, both perceptual-expertise and social-categorization models have been proposed to explain the effect. The two studies reported here investigated the extent to which categorizing other people as in-group versus out-group members is sufficient to elicit a pattern of face recognition analogous to that of the CRE, even when perceptual expertise with the stimuli is held constant. In Study 1, targets were categorized as members of real-life in-groups and out-groups (based on university affiliation), whereas in Study 2, targets were categorized into experimentally created minimal groups. In both studies, recognition performance was better for targets categorized as in-group members, despite the fact that perceptual expertise was equivalent for in-group and out-group faces. These results suggest that social-cognitive mechanisms of in-group and out-group categorization are sufficient to elicit performance differences for in-group and out-group face recognition.
机译:尽管交叉种族效应(CRE)是一个公认的现象,但已经提出了感知专家和社会分类模型来解释这种效应。此处报道的两项研究调查了将他人分为组内成员与组外成员的程度,足以在某种程度上引发类似于CRE的面部识别模式,即使在刺激方面的感知专业知识保持不变的情况下。在研究1中,将目标分类为现实生活中的小组和小组成员(基于大学的隶属关系),而在研究2中,将目标分类为通过实验创建的最小小组。在这两项研究中,尽管感知专业知识与组内和组外面孔等效,但对于归类为组内成员的目标,识别性能更好。这些结果表明,小组内和小组外分类的社会认知机制足以引起小组内和小组外人脸识别的性能差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号