...
首页> 外文期刊>Professional case management >The case manager as expert witness.
【24h】

The case manager as expert witness.

机译:案件经理为专家证人。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In today's litigious world, more and more professionals are being called upon to testify as both fact and expert witnesses. Both state and federal law require the testimony of a like-kind professional to establish the standard of care or standard of professional practice, although some states are expanding the "like-kind" definition. Case Management, although not entirely recognized as a separate and distinct profession (as each practitioner must have an underlying profession to qualify as a case manager), is,no stranger to lawsuits. More and more attorneys across the country are identifying case managers as potential defendants in professional liability lawsuits. The most common area of liability appears to be in those cases where case managers make decisions based on cost-savings alone, without regard to quality. Clearly, such an action is contrary to the established standard of practice of both the Case Management Society of America (CMSA, 2010) and the Code of Ethical Conduct of the Commission for Case Management Certification (CCMC, 2009). CMSA, the professional organization and CCMC, the credentialing body, share the position that cost-effective case management must include a comparative analysis that considers the needs of the individual client, quality of service/product considered, and the impact on the payor.
机译:在当今的诉讼世界中,越来越多的专业人员被要求作为事实证人和专家证人作证。州和联邦法律都要求有同类专业人员的证词来确立护理标准或专业实践标准,尽管有些州正在扩大“同类”定义。案例管理虽然并未完全被公认是一个独立且独特的行业(因为每个从业者必须具备从事案例管理的资格),但对诉讼并不陌生。全国越来越多的律师将案件经理确定为职业责任诉讼的潜在被告。最常见的赔偿责任似乎是在案例管理人员仅根据节省成本而不考虑质量而做出决策的情况下。显然,此举违反了美国案件管理协会(CMSA,2010)和案件管理认证委员会的道德行为守则(CCMC,2009)的既定实践标准。 CMSA(专业组织)和CCMC(证书颁发机构)的立场是,具有成本效益的案例管理必须包括一个比较分析,该分析应考虑单个客户的需求,所考虑的服务/产品的质量以及对付款人的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号