首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H. Journal of Engineering in Medicine >Fluid, solid and fluid-structure interaction simulations on patientbased abdominal aortic aneurysm models
【24h】

Fluid, solid and fluid-structure interaction simulations on patientbased abdominal aortic aneurysm models

机译:基于患者的腹主动脉瘤模型的流体,固体和流体-结构相互作用模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article describes the use of fluid, solid and fluid-structure interaction simulations on three patient-based abdominal aortic aneurysm geometries. All simulations were carried out using OpenFOAM, which uses the finite volume method to solve both fluid and solid equations. Initially a fluid-only simulation was carried out on a single patient-based geometry and results from this simulation were compared with experimental results. There was good qualitative and quantitative agreement between the experimental and numerical results, suggesting that OpenFOAM is capable of predicting the main features of unsteady flow through a complex patient-based abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry. The intraluminal thrombus and arterial wall were then included, and solid stress and fluid-structure interaction simulations were performed on this, and two other patient-based abdominal aortic aneurysm geometries. It was found that the solid stress simulations resulted in an under-estimation of the maximum stress by up to 5.9% when compared with the fluid- structure interaction simulations. In the fluid-structure interaction simulations, flow induced pressure within the aneurysm was found to be up to 4.8% higher than the value of peak systolic pressure imposed in the solid stress simulations, which is likely to be the cause of the variation in the stress results. In comparing the results from the initial fluid-only simulation with results from the fluid-structure interaction simulation on the same patient, it was found that wall shear stress values varied by up to 35% between the two simulation methods. It was concluded that solid stress simulations are adequate to predict the maximum stress in an aneurysm wall, while fluid-structure interaction simulations should be performed if accurate prediction of the fluid wall shear stress is necessary. Therefore, the decision to perform fluid- structure interaction simulations should be based on the particular variables of interest in a given study.
机译:本文介绍了在三个基于患者的腹主动脉瘤几何形状上使用流体,固体和流体-结构相互作用模拟的方法。所有模拟都是使用OpenFOAM进行的,OpenFOAM使用有限体积方法来求解流体和固体方程。最初,仅对单个基于患者的几何体进行了仅流体模拟,并将该模拟结果与实验结果进行了比较。实验和数值结果之间存在良好的定性和定量一致性,这表明OpenFOAM能够预测通过复杂的基于患者的腹主动脉瘤几何形状的不稳定流动的主要特征。然后包括腔内血栓和动脉壁,并对此进行了固体应力和流体-结构相互作用的模拟,以及其他两个基于患者的腹主动脉瘤的几何形状。发现与流体-结构相互作用模拟相比,固体应力模拟导致最大应力低估了5.9%。在流固耦合模拟中,发现动脉瘤内的流动诱发压力比在固体应力模拟中施加的峰值收缩压高出4.8%,这很可能是应力变化的原因。结果。在将初始仅流体模拟的结果与同一患者的流固耦合模拟的结果进行比较时,发现两种模拟方法之间的壁切应力值变化高达35%。结论是,固体应力模拟足以预测动脉瘤壁的最大应力,而如果需要准确预测流体壁剪切应力,则应进行流体-结构相互作用模拟。因此,进行流体-结构相互作用模拟的决定应基于给定研究中感兴趣的特定变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号