...
首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C. Journal of mechanical engineering science >An evaluation of dexterity and cutaneous sensibility tests for use with medical gloves
【24h】

An evaluation of dexterity and cutaneous sensibility tests for use with medical gloves

机译:与医用手套一起使用的灵活性和皮肤敏感性测试的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The ability of selected dexterity and cutaneous sensibility tests to measure the effect of medical glove properties (material, fit, and number of layers) on manual performance was analyzed. Manual performance testing of gloves todate has focused on thicker gloves where the effects are more obvious. However, clinicians have reported dissatisfaction with some medical gloves and a perceived detriment to performance of new materials compared to latex. Three tests (Purdue Pegboard Test, Crawford Small Parts Dexterity Test, and Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments) were performed by 18 subjects in five hand conditions (ungloved; best-fitting, loose-fitting and a double layer of latex examination gloves; best-fitting vinyl gloves). Tests were performed in the ungloved condition first, and the order of the gloved tests was randomized. Learning behavior was also measured. The Purdue test showed a significant effect of hand condition, but no differences between latex and vinyl. No significant effect of hand condition was found in the Crawford "pins and Collars'' test, but the "Screws'' test showed promising discrimination between glove types. The Monofilaments test showed a significant effect of hand condition on cutaneous sensibility, particularly a reduction when "double-gloving,'' but no significant differences between glove types. Existing tests show some ability to measure the effect of gloves and their properties on manual performance but are not comprehensive and require further validation. In order to fully describe the effects of medical gloves on manual performance, further tests should be designed with greater resolution and that better replicate clinical manual tasks.
机译:分析了选定的灵活性和皮肤敏感性测试测量医用手套性能(材料,合身性和层数)对手动性能的影响的能力。迄今为止,对手套的手动性能测试主要集中在较厚的手套上,效果更明显。但是,临床医生已经报告对某些医用手套不满意,并且与乳胶相比,这种材料被认为不利于新材料的性能。 18位受试者在五种手部状况(不喜欢,最合身,宽松和双层乳胶检查手套;最合身)下进行了三项测试(Purdue钉板测试,Crawford小零件敏捷性测试和Semmes-Weinstein单丝测试)乙烯基手套)。首先在无保护的状态下进行测试,并随机进行戴手套的测试顺序。还测量了学习行为。普渡试验显示出手感的显着影响,但乳胶和乙烯基之间没有差异。在Crawford的“大头针和项圈”测试中,没有发现手部状况的显着影响,但“螺丝”测试表明,手套类型之间的区分很有希望。单丝测试显示手部状况对皮肤敏感性有显着影响,尤其是“双手套”时有所减轻,但手套类型之间没有显着差异,现有的测试表明可以测量手套的影响及其性能对手动性能的影响。为了全面描述医用手套对手动操作的影响,应设计更高的分辨率并更好地复制临床手动任务,以进行进一步的测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号