...
首页> 外文期刊>PM & R: the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation >Early mobilization in critically ill patients: patients' mobilization level depends on health care provider's profession.
【24h】

Early mobilization in critically ill patients: patients' mobilization level depends on health care provider's profession.

机译:重症患者的早期动员:患者的动员水平取决于医疗保健提供者的专业。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the level of mobilization achieved and the barriers for progressing to the next mobilization level differ between nurses and physical therapists. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Twenty-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of the Massachusetts General Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-three critically ill patients. METHODS: Physical therapists and nurses performed 179 mobilization therapies with 63 patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Mobilization was defined as the process of enhancing mobility in the SICU, including bed mobility, edge of bed activities, transfers out of bed to a chair, and gait training; the mobilization level was measured on the SICU optimal mobilization scale, a 5-point (0-4) numerical rating scale. RESULTS: Patients' level of mobilization achieved by physical therapists was significantly higher compared with that achieved by nurses (2.3 +/- 1.2 mean +/- SD versus 1.2 +/- 1.2, respectively P < .0001). Different barriers for mobilization were identified by physical therapists and nurses: hemodynamic instability (26% versus 12%, P = .03) and renal replacement therapy (12% versus 1%, P = .03) were barriers rated higher by nurses, whereas neurologic impairment was rated higher by physical therapists providers (18% versus 38%, P = .002). No mobilization-associated adverse events were observed in this study. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that physical therapists mobilize their critically ill patients to higher levels compared with nurses. Nurse and physical therapists identify different barriers for mobilization. Routine involvement of physical therapists in directing mobilization treatment may promote early mobilization of critically ill patients.
机译:目的:评估护士和理疗师之间实现的动员水平以及进入下一个动员水平的障碍是否存在差异。设计:前瞻性观察研究。地点:马萨诸塞州总医院的二十张床的外科重症监护室(SICU)。参与者:63名重症患者。方法:理疗师和护士对63例患者进行了179种动员疗法。结局测量:动员被定义为增强SICU行动能力的过程,包括床行动力,床活动边缘,床下转移到椅子上以及步态训练。动员水平是根据SICU最佳动员量表(5分(0-4)数字评分量表)测量的。结果:理疗师实现的患者动员水平明显高于护士实现的动员水平(2.3 +/- 1.2均值+/- SD与1.2 +/- 1.2分别为P <.0001)。物理治疗师和护士确定了不同的动员障碍:护士对血流动力学不稳定(26%比12%,P = .03)和肾脏替代疗法(12%对1%,P = .03)的评价更高。理疗师对神经系统损伤的评分较高(分别为18%和38%,P = .002)。在这项研究中未观察到与动员相关的不良事件。结论:这项研究表明,理疗师比护士更动员危重病人。护士和理疗师确定动员的不同障碍。物理治疗师定期参与动员治疗可能会促进重症患者的早期动员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号