首页> 外文期刊>PM & R: the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation >Reliability of gait performance tests in individuals with late effects of polio.
【24h】

Reliability of gait performance tests in individuals with late effects of polio.

机译:脊髓灰质炎后期影响的个人步态表现测试的可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of 4 gait performance tests in individuals with late effects of polio. DESIGN: An intrarater (between occasions) test-retest reliability study. SETTINGS: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty men and women (mean age 63 +/- 6.4 years) with clinically and electrophysiologically verified late effects of polio. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Timed "Up & Go" test, the Comfortable and the Fast Gait Speed tests, and the 6-Minute Walk test were assessed 7 days apart. Reliability was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1)), the mean difference between the test sessions (d), and the 95% confidence intervals for d, the standard error of measurement (SEM and SEM%), the smallest real difference (SRD and SRD%) and the Bland & Altman graphs. RESULTS: Test-retest agreements were high (ICC(2,1) 0.82-0.97) and measurement errors generally small. The standard error of measurement (SEM%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a group of individuals, was small (4%-7%). The smallest real difference (SRD%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a single individual also was small (12%-21%). CONCLUSION: These commonly used gait performance tests are highly reliable and can be recommended to evaluate improvements in various aspects of gait performance in groups of individuals as well as single individuals with late effects of polio.
机译:目的:评估4例步态性行为测试对脊髓灰质炎晚期影响者的可靠性。设计:内部评估者(在不同场合之间)进行重测可靠性研究。地点:大学医院。参与者:30名男性和女性(平均年龄63 +/- 6.4岁),经临床和电生理学证实为脊髓灰质炎的晚期影响。干预:不适用。主要观察指标:定时“ Up&Go”测试,舒适步态和快速步态测试以及6分钟步行测试相隔7天进行评估。使用组内相关系数(ICC(2,1)),测试阶段之间的平均差(d)和d的95%置信区间,测量的标准误差(SEM和SEM%),最小实际差异(SRD和SRD%)以及Bland和Altman图。结果:重测协议较高(ICC(2,1)0.82-0.97)和测量误差通常较小。测量的标准误差(SEM%)很小(4%-7%),代表最小的变化,表明一组个体的实际(临床)改善。最小的实际差异(SRD%)表示最小的变化,它表示单个人的实际(临床)改善也很小(12%-21%)。结论:这些常用的步态表现测试是高度可靠的,建议将其评估成组的个体以及具有小儿麻痹症晚期影响的单个个体在步态表现各个方面的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号