...
首页> 外文期刊>Platelets >Methodological considerations for the assessment of ADP induced platelet aggregation using the Multiplate? analyser
【24h】

Methodological considerations for the assessment of ADP induced platelet aggregation using the Multiplate? analyser

机译:使用Multiplate评估ADP诱导的血小板聚集的方法学考虑?分析仪

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Factors affecting the Multiplate? assays analytical precision have not been well defined. We investigated the effect of methodological factors on the measurement of ADP-induced platelet aggregation using the Multiplate? assay. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was analysed in whole blood using the Multiplate? assay. We tested the reproducibility of measurement, the effect of different anticoagulants (hirudin, citrate and heparin) and the effect of time delay (15, 30, 45, 60, 120 and 180 minutes) between sampling and analysis in patients. The use of a manual calibrated pipette with the Multiplate? analyser was also tested. The mean coefficient of variation (CV) using the manufacturers recommended methods was 10.8 ± 8.7% (n = 30). When compared to hirudin (359.5 ± 309 AU*min) the use of heparin (521.0 ± 316 AU*min, p = 0.0015) increased platelet aggregation, while the use of sodium citrate (245.0 ± 209 AU*min, p = 0.003) decreased the platelet aggregation (n = 20). The addition of CaCl2 to the citrate- anticoagulated blood resulted in platelet aggregation levels similar to hirudin. Platelet aggregation varied with time delay (n = 20). When compared to platelet aggregation at 30 minutes (391.1 ± 283 AU*min), platelet aggregation was reduced at 60 minutes (335.2 ± 251.6 AU*min, p < 0.05), 120 minutes (198.8 ± 122.9 AU*min, p < 0.001) and 180 minutes (160.7 ± 92 AU*min, p < 0.001). The use of a manual calibrated pipette did not significantly reduce the mean CV in the assay (n = 20). Methodological factors such as the anticoagulant used and the time delay should be standardised where possible to reduce variability, and allow thresholds derived from one study to be comparable across multiple studies.
机译:影响多板的因素?分析的分析精度尚未明确定义。我们调查了方法因素对使用Multiplate?测量ADP诱导的血小板聚集的影响。分析。使用Multiplate?分析全血中ADP诱导的血小板聚集。分析。我们测试了测量的可重复性,不同抗凝剂(水ud素,柠檬酸盐和肝素)的效果以及患者采样和分析之间的时间延迟(15、30、45、60、120和180分钟)的效果。在Multiplate中使用手动校准的移液器?分析仪也经过测试。使用制造商推荐的方法,平均变异系数(CV)为10.8±8.7%(n = 30)。与水hi素(359.5±309 AU * min)相比,使用肝素(521.0±316 AU * min,p = 0.0015)增加血小板凝集,而使用柠檬酸钠(245.0±209 AU * min,p = 0.003)降低血小板聚集(n = 20)。向柠檬酸抗凝血液中添加CaCl2会导致血小板聚集水平类似于水rud素。血小板聚集随时间延迟而变化(n = 20)。与30分钟(391.1±283 AU * min)的血小板凝集相比,60分钟(335.2±251.6 AU * min,p <0.05),120分钟(198.8±122.9 AU * min,p <0.001)的血小板凝集减少)和180分钟(160.7±92 AU * min,p <0.001)。使用手动校准的移液器并没有显着降低测定中的平均CV(n = 20)。方法学因素,例如使用的抗凝剂和时间延迟,应在可能的情况下进行标准化,以减少变异性,并使一项研究得出的阈值在多个研究中具有可比性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号