首页> 外文期刊>Perception >Learning and generalization in haptic classification of 2-D raised-line drawings of facial expressions of emotion by sighted and adventitiously blind observers
【24h】

Learning and generalization in haptic classification of 2-D raised-line drawings of facial expressions of emotion by sighted and adventitiously blind observers

机译:有视力和偶然性的观察者对情感面部表情的二维立体画的触觉分类的学习和归纳

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sighted blindfolded individuals can successfully classify basic facial expressions of emotion (FEEs) by manually exploring simple 2-D raised-line drawings (Lederman et al 2008, IEEE Transactions on Haptics 1 27 ^ 38). The effect of training on classification accuracy was assessed by sixty sighted blindfolded participants (experiment 1) and by three adventitiously blind participants (experiment 2). We further investigated whether the underlying learning process(es) constituted token-specific learning and/or generalization. A hybrid learning paradigm comprising pre/post and oldew test comparisons was used. For both participant groups, classification accuracy for old (ie trained) drawings markedly increased over study trials (mean improvement =76%, and 88%, respectively). Additionally, RT decreased by a mean of 30% for the sighted, and 31% for the adventitiously blind. Learning was mostly token-specific, but some generalization was also observed for both groups. The sighted classified novel drawings of all six FEEs faster with training (mean RT decrease = 20%). Accuracy also improved significantly (mean improve- ment =20%), but this improvement was restricted to two FEEs (anger and sadness). Two of three adventitiously blind participants classified new drawings more accurately (mean improvement = 30%); however, RTs for this group did not reflect generalization. Based on a limited number of blind subjects, our results tentatively suggest that adventitiously blind individuals learn to haptically classify FEEs as well as, or even better than, sighted persons.
机译:蒙着眼睛的人可以通过手动探索简单的2D轮廓线绘图成功地对基本的面部表情(FEEs)进行分类(Lederman等,2008,IEEE Transactions on Haptics 1 27 ^ 38)。培训对分类准确性的影响由60位有眼盲的参与者(实验1)和三位不定目的盲人参与者(实验2)评估。我们进一步调查了基础学习过程是否构成了特定于令牌的学习和/或概括。使用了包含前/后和旧/新测试比较的混合学习范例。对于两个参与者组,旧的(即训练有素的)图纸的分类准确性均比研究试验显着提高(平均改善分别为76%和88%)。此外,视力正常者的RT下降了30%,不明目的视力下降了31%。学习大多是特定于令牌的,但是两组都观察到一些概括。在训练中,所有六个FEE的分类视力新颖的图纸可见(平均RT减少= 20%)。准确性也显着提高(平均提高= 20%),但是这种提高仅限于两个FEE(愤怒和悲伤)。三位不明身份的参与者中有两位对新图纸进行了更准确的分类(平均改善= 30%);然而,该组的RTs没有反映出普遍性。基于有限数量的盲人受试者,我们的研究结果初步表明,不定盲人学会了对FEE进行触觉分类,甚至比有视力的人更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号