首页> 外文期刊>Perception >Centred egocentric, decentred egocentric, and allocentric spatial representations in the peripersonal space of congenital total blindness
【24h】

Centred egocentric, decentred egocentric, and allocentric spatial representations in the peripersonal space of congenital total blindness

机译:先天性全盲的人际空间中的中心自我中心,分散自我中心和同心中心空间表示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The distinction between different spatial representations in the peripersonal space was examined in two experiments by requiring sighted blindfolded and blind participants to remember the locations of objects haptically explored. In experiment 1, object relocation took place from either the same position as learning-with the same (centred egocentric condition) or 90 degrees-rotated (rotated egocentric condition) object array-or from a position different from the learning position (allocentric condition). Results revealed that, in both sighted and blind people, distance errors were higher in the allocentric and rotated conditions than in the centred egocentric condition, and that blind participants made more distance errors than sighted subjects only in the allocentric condition. Experiment 2 repeated rotated egocentric and allocentric conditions, while the centred egocentric condition was replaced by a decentred egocentric condition in which object relocation took place from the same position as learning (egocentric) but started from a decentred point. The decentred egocentric condition was found to remain significantly different from the rotated condition, but not from the allocentric condition. Moreover, blind participants performed less well in the allocentric condition, but were specifically impaired. Overall, our results confirm that different types of spatial constraints and representations, including the decentred egocentric one, can be distinguished in the peripersonal space and that blind people are as efficient as sighted in the egocentric and rotated conditions, but they encounter difficulties in recalling locations also in the peripersonal space, especially when an allocentric condition is required.
机译:在两个实验中,要求有视力的蒙着眼睛的和盲目的参与者记住经过触觉探索的物体的位置,从而检验了人际空间中不同空间表示之间的区别。在实验1中,对象重定位从与学习相同的位置(具有相同的(中心自我中心状态)或90度旋转(旋转的自我中心状态)对象阵列)发生,或者从与学习位置不同的位置(异心状态)发生。结果表明,在有视力的人和盲人中,同心心和旋转条件下的距离误差均高于居中的自我中心状态,盲人的参与者比仅有同心心条件下的目击者造成的距离误差更大。实验2重复了旋转的自我中心和同心中心条件,而居中的自我中心条件被分散的自我中心条件所代替,在分散的自我中心条件下,对象的重新定位从与学习相同的位置发生(自我中心),但从偏离中心开始。发现偏心的自我中心状态与旋转状态保持显着不同,但与同心轴状态没有显着差异。此外,盲人参与者在同素中心状态下的表现较差,但受到了特别的损害。总体而言,我们的结果证实,可以在人际空间中区分不同类型的空间约束和表征,包括分散的以自我为中心的事物,并且盲人的效率与在以自我为中心和轮换条件下所见的效率相同,但在召回位置时遇到困难在人际空间也是如此,特别是在需要同心圆的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号