首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Physician-investigator phone elicitation of consent in the field: a novel method to obtain explicit informed consent for prehospital clinical research.
【24h】

Physician-investigator phone elicitation of consent in the field: a novel method to obtain explicit informed consent for prehospital clinical research.

机译:医师-研究者在该领域的电话诱发同意:一种获得院前临床研究明确知情同意的新方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective. To describe and report the feasibility of a novel field telephonic strategy to elicit explicit informed consent in prehospital trials for conditions in which patients retain decision-making capacity. Methods. In a pilot prehospital neuroprotective stroke therapy trial, ambulances carried written informed consent forms and dedicated trial cellular phones permitting rapid connection to on call physician-investigators. The physician-investigator discussed the trial with the consent provider [patient if competent, on scene legally authorized representative (LAR) if patient not competent] by phone, while paramedics carried out prehospital care duties unimpeded. Results. 32 patients met consent elicitation criteria. 20 (63%) were enrolled. The most frequent reasons for non-enrollment were: patient not competent and no available on-scene LAR-5; patient/LAR declined participation-4. Among enrollees, 15 (75%) were competent and self-enrolled; 5 (25%) were not competent and were enrolled by LAR family members. Site of consent initiation was: patient home-15 (74 = 5%), work-2(10)%, other-3(15)%. Consent was elicited via cell phone in 11 (55%) and site landline in 9 (45%). Compared with patients enrolled in prior studies employing standard in-hospital consent, prehospital consent procedures reduced time from paramedic arrival on-scene to start of study agent (26 vs 139 mins, p < 0.0001), and did not prolong the on-scene to ED arrival time (37 vs 34 min, p = 0.50). No patient/family withdrew consent during the 3-month follow-up period. Conclusion. Physician phone elicitation of prehospital research consent from individuals with retained competency or on-scene legally authorized representatives is feasible, permits rapid patient study entry, and does not delay field transport times. of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.
机译:目的。描述并报告一种新颖的现场电话策略在院前试验中针对患者保留决策能力的条件征得明确知情同意的可行性。方法。在一项试点的院前神经保护性中风治疗试验中,救护车携带了书面知情同意书和专用的试验手机,从而可以迅速联系到待命的医师-研究人员。医师与研究人员通过电话与同意提供者(如果合格的患者,如果患者不合格的话,由现场合法授权的代表(LAR)进行电话讨论),而护理人员则不受阻碍地履行院前护理职责。结果。 32名患者符合知情同意标准。招募了20(63%)。不能入组的最常见原因是:患者没有能力并且现场没有可用的LAR-5;患者/ LAR拒绝参与-4。在注册者中,有15名(75%)是能干的并且是自助式。 5名(25%)不称职,由LAR家庭成员录取。同意开始的地点是:15例患者家(74 = 5%),工作2(10)%,其他3(15)%。通过手机获得同意的比例为11(55%),通过座机获得同意的比例为9(45%)。与先前接受标准院内同意研究的患者相比,院前同意程序减少了从医护人员到达现场到开始研究代理的时间(26 vs 139分钟,p <0.0001),并且没有延长现场随访时间。急诊到达时间(37 vs 34 min,p = 0.50)。在3个月的随访期内,没有患者/家人撤回同意书。结论。由具有保留权限的人员或现场经法律授权的代表对患者进行院前研究同意的医师电话是可行的,可以快速进行患者研究,并且不会延迟现场运输时间。 EMS医师和国家EMS局长协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号