首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >PREHOSPITAL PEDIATRIC CARE: OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRAINING, TREATMENT, AND RESEARCH
【24h】

PREHOSPITAL PEDIATRIC CARE: OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRAINING, TREATMENT, AND RESEARCH

机译:院前儿科护理:培训,治疗和研究的机会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. Pediatric transports comprise approximately 10% of emergency medical services (EMS) requests for aid, but little is known about the clinical characteristics of pediatric EMS patients and the interventions they receive. Our objective was to describe the pediatric prehospital patient cohort in a large metropolitan EMS system. Methods. This retrospective analysis of all pediatric (age <19 years) EMS patients transported from October 2011 to September 2013 was conducted by reviewing a system-wide National EMS Information System (NEMSIS)-compliant database of all EMS patient encounters. We identified the most common primary working assessments, the frequency of abnormal initial vital signs, and the interventions provided. Vital signs included systolic blood pressure (SBP), respiratory (RR) and pulse rate, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), pulse oximetry (Pox), and respiratory effort. We defined abnormal vital signs using previously reported age-specific standards. We identified the working assessments most frequently associated with abnormal vital signs and the working assessments associated with the most commonly performed interventions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results. There were 9,956 pediatric transports, 8.7% of the total call volume. The most common working assessments were "other" (16.1%), respiratory distress (13.7%), seizure (12.4%), and blunt trauma (12.0%). Vital signs were documented at variable rates: RR (91.1%), GCS (82.9%), SBP (71.3%), pulse (69.4%), respiratory effort (49.7%), and Pox (33.5%). Of all transported patients, 61.5% had a documented abnormal initial vital sign. Patients with an abnormal vital sign had the same most common working assessments as those with normal vital signs. Glucometry (16.9%), medication delivery (13.6%), and IV placement (11.5%) were the most common interventions and were most often provided to patients with working assessments of seizure, asthma, trauma, altered consciousness, or "other." Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (0.4%), bag mask ventilation (0.4%), and advanced airway (0.4%) occurred rarely and were most often performed for cardiac arrest and trauma. Conclusions. Children made up a small part of EMS providers' clinical practice; those encountered most frequently had respiratory distress, seizures, trauma, or an undefined assessment (i.e., "other"). EMS providers frequently encounter children with physiologic evidence of acute illness, although vital sign documentation was incomplete. Prehospital providers infrequently perform pediatric interventions. Describing EMS providers' interaction with children provides the opportunity to target improvements in pediatric prehospital treatment, training, and research.
机译:目的。儿科运输约占紧急医疗服务(EMS)援助请求的10%,但对儿科EMS患者的临床特征及其接受的干预知之甚少。我们的目的是描述大型都市EMS系统中的儿科住院患者队列。方法。对2011年10月至2013年9月转运的所有儿科(年龄小于19岁)EMS患者进行了回顾性分析,方法是回顾所有EMS患者遇到的全系统符合国家EMS信息系统(NEMSIS)的数据库。我们确定了最常见的主要工作评估,异常初始生命体征的发生频率以及所提供的干预措施。生命体征包括收缩压(SBP),呼吸(RR)和脉搏率,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS),脉搏血氧饱和度(Pox)和呼吸努力。我们使用先前报道的特定年龄标准定义异常生命体征。我们确定了与异常生命体征最频繁相关的工作评估以及与最常执行的干预措施相关的工作评估。使用描述性统计数据分析数据。结果。儿科交通次数为9,956,占总通话量的8.7%。最常见的工作评估为“其他”(16.1%),呼吸窘迫(13.7%),癫痫发作(12.4%)和钝性创伤(12.0%)。记录的生命体征变化率:RR(91.1%),GCS(82.9%),SBP(71.3%),脉搏(69.4%),呼吸努力(49.7%)和Pox(33.5%)。在所有转运患者中,有61.5%的患者有记录的初始生命体征异常。生命体征异常的患者与生命体征正常的患者进行最常见的工作评估相同。血糖测量(16.9%),药物输送(13.6%)和静脉放置(11.5%)是最常见的干预措施,最常提供给癫痫发作,哮喘,创伤,意识改变或“其他”患者进行工作评估。心肺复苏(0.4%),面罩通气(0.4%)和晚期气道(0.4%)很少发生,并且最常用于心脏骤停和创伤。结论。儿童占EMS提供者临床实践的一小部分;那些最常遇到的人有呼吸窘迫,癫痫发作,外伤或不确定的评估(即“其他”)。 EMS提供者经常会遇到具有急性疾病生理学证据的儿童,尽管生命体征文档不完整。院前提供者很少进行儿科干预。描述EMS提供者与儿童的互动为针对儿科院前治疗,培训和研究的改善提供了机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号