...
首页> 外文期刊>Paediatric anaesthesia >Comparative evaluation of midazolam and ketamine with midazolam alone as oral premedication.
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of midazolam and ketamine with midazolam alone as oral premedication.

机译:咪达唑仑和氯胺酮与单独的咪达唑仑作为口服药物的比较评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Summary Background : Oral premedication with midazolam and ketamine is widely used in pediatric anesthesia to reduce emotional trauma and ensure smooth induction. However, various dosing regimens when used alone or in combination have variable efficacy and side effect profile. The aim of our study was to investigate and compare the efficacy of oral midazolam alone with a low-dose combination of oral midazolam and ketamine. Methods : We performed a prospective randomized double-blind study in 100 children who were randomly allocated into two groups. Group M received 0.5 mg.kg(-1) oral midazolam and group MK received 0.25 mg.kg(-1) oral midazolam with 2.5 mg.kg(-1) oral ketamine. The preoperative sedation score, ease of parental separation and ease of mask acceptance were evaluated on a 4-point scale. The time to recovery from anesthesia and to achieve satisfactory Aldrete score was also noted. Results : Uniform and acceptable sedation scores were seen in both the groups (group M 95.9%; group MK 97.96%),without any serious side effects. However, the combination offered significantly more children in an awake, calm and quiet state, who were easily separated from their parents (73.46% in MK vs 41% in group M). The induction scores were comparable between the groups. The recovery room characteristics and time to achieve satisfactory Aldrete score were also comparable between the two groups. Conclusions : Oral midazolam alone and a combination of midazolam with ketamine provide equally effective anxiolysis and separation characteristics. However, the combination provided more children in an awake, calm and quiet state who could be separated easily from parents.
机译:摘要背景:咪达唑仑和氯胺酮的口服前药广泛用于儿科麻醉中,以减少情绪创伤并确保顺利引产。然而,当单独或组合使用时,各种给药方案具有可变的功效和副作用特征。我们研究的目的是调查并比较口服咪达唑仑与低剂量口服咪达唑仑和氯胺酮的联合使用的疗效。方法:我们对100名随机分为两组的儿童进行了一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。 M组接受0.5 mg.kg(-1)口服咪达唑仑,MK组接受0.25 mg.kg(-1)口服咪达唑仑和2.5 mg.kg(-1)口服氯胺酮。术前镇静评分,父母分离的容易程度和面罩的接受程度以4分制进行评估。还指出了从麻醉中恢复并达到令人满意的Aldrete评分的时间。结果:两组均获得了一致且可接受的镇静评分(M组为95.9%; MK组为97.96%),而没有任何严重的副作用。但是,这种组合为处于清醒,平静和安静状态的孩子提供了更多的机会,他们很容易与父母分离(MK为73.46%,M组为41%)。两组之间的入学分数相当。两组的恢复室特征和获得满意Aldrete评分的时间也相当。结论:单独的口服咪达唑仑和咪达唑仑与氯胺酮的组合提供同样有效的抗焦虑和分离特性。但是,这种结合使更多的孩子处于清醒,平静和安静的状态,可以很容易地与父母分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号