...
首页> 外文期刊>Poultry Science >Foam-based mass emergency depopulation of floor-reared meat-type poultry operations
【24h】

Foam-based mass emergency depopulation of floor-reared meat-type poultry operations

机译:以泡沫为基础的地面饲养的肉类家禽生产活动的紧急人口减少

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Current control strategies for avian influenza and other highly contagious poultry diseases often include quarantine, depopulation, and disposal of infected birds. For biosecurity reasons, on-farm depopulation and disposal methods are preferred. The options for mass depopulation are limited, as reported by the "2000 Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia." Current depopulation techniques may have excessive labor requirements, are not appropriate for all house types, and may not be suitable for large-scale emergency implementation. A procedure has been developed that uses foam to rapidly form a blanket over the birds. The procedure requires relatively few people, can be performed in a variety of house types, and is compatible with in-house composting. Results from 2 experiments using foam for depopulation are presented in this paper. These studies have shown that foams are comparable to the CO(2) polyethylene tent procedure in time to death in small groups and that the foam is faster as group size increases. Adding CO(2) to the foam does not enhance its efficacy. Based on corticosterone levels, the study also showed that the foams are no more stressful than the CO(2) depopulation method. Necropsy and histological examination of birds indicated that blood was present to some degree in the trachea, syrinx, and bronchial tree in broilers subjected to foam with CO(2), foam without CO(2), and CO(2) polyethylene tent methods of depopulation. Foam caused a rapid onset of airway occlusion. In both foam- and CO(2)-euthanized broilers, lesions are consistent with anoxia or hypoxia. This suggests that foam acts by physically induced hypoxia, whereas CO(2) causes chemically induced hypoxia.
机译:当前针对禽流感和其他高度传染性家禽疾病的控制策略通常包括隔离,减少种群数量和处置感染的鸟类。出于生物安全的原因,优选农场中的人口减少和处置方法。如“ AVMA安乐死专家小组2000年报告”所报告的,大规模人口减少的选择是有限的。当前的人口减少技术可能需要过多的劳动力,并不适合所有房屋类型,并且可能不适用于大规模的紧急情况。已经开发出一种使用泡沫快速在鸟类身上形成毯子的程序。该程序所需的人员相对较少,可以在各种类型的房屋中进行,并且与室内堆肥兼容。本文介绍了使用泡沫消除种群的2个实验的结果。这些研究表明,在小组死亡时,泡沫在死亡时间方面可与CO(2)聚乙烯帐篷程序相媲美,并且随着小组人数的增加,泡沫速度更快。向泡沫中添加CO(2)不会增强其功效。根据皮质酮水平,该研究还表明,泡沫没有比CO(2)人口减少方法更具压力。尸体尸检和组织学检查表明,肉鸡的气管,syrinx和支气管树中存在一定程度的血液,这些肉鸡的泡沫使用了CO(2),无CO(2)和CO(2)聚乙烯帐篷制。人口减少。泡沫引起气道阻塞迅速发作。在泡沫和CO(2)安乐死的肉鸡中,病变与缺氧或缺氧一致。这表明泡沫的作用是物理诱导的缺氧,而CO(2)会导致化学诱导的缺氧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号