首页> 外文期刊>Poultry Science >A comparison of artificial neural networks with other statistical approaches for the prediction of true metabolizable energy of meat and bone meal.
【24h】

A comparison of artificial neural networks with other statistical approaches for the prediction of true metabolizable energy of meat and bone meal.

机译:人工神经网络与其他统计方法的比较,用于预测肉和骨粉的真实代谢能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been a considerable and continuous interest to develop equations for rapid and accurate prediction of the ME of meat and bone meal. In this study, an artificial neural network (ANN), a partial least squares (PLS), and a multiple linear regression (MLR) statistical method were used to predict the TMEn of meat and bone meal based on its CP, ether extract, and ash content. The accuracy of the models was calculated by R2 value, MS error, mean absolute percentage error, mean absolute deviation, bias, and Theil's U. The predictive ability of an ANN was compared with a PLS and a MLR model using the same training data sets. The squared regression coefficients of prediction for the MLR, PLS, and ANN models were 0.38, 0.36, and 0.94, respectively. The results revealed that ANN produced more accurate predictions of TMEn as compared with PLS and MLR methods. Based on the results of this study, ANN could be used as a promising approach for rapid prediction of nutritive value of meat and bone meal
机译:开发用于快速和准确地预测肉和骨粉的ME的方程式引起了人们的持续关注。在这项研究中,人工神经网络(ANN),偏最小二乘(PLS)和多元线性回归(MLR)统计方法用于基于肉和骨粉的CPEn,乙醚提取物和灰分。通过R2值,MS误差,平均绝对百分比误差,平均绝对偏差,偏差和Theil的U来计算模型的准确性。使用相同的训练数据集,将ANN的预测能力与PLS和MLR模型进行比较。 MLR,PLS和ANN模型的预测的平方回归系数分别为0.38、0.36和0.94。结果表明,与PLS和MLR方法相比,ANN可以更准确地预测TMEn。根据这项研究的结果,人工神经网络可以用作快速预测肉和骨粉营养价值的有前途的方法

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号