...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy >Does amplitude-modulated frequency have a role in the hypoalgesic response of interferential current on pressure pain sensitivity in healthy subjects? A randomised crossover study.
【24h】

Does amplitude-modulated frequency have a role in the hypoalgesic response of interferential current on pressure pain sensitivity in healthy subjects? A randomised crossover study.

机译:在健康受试者中,调幅频率在干扰电流对压力疼痛敏感性的痛觉过敏反应中是否起作用?一项随机交叉研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hypoalgesic effect of amplitude-modulated frequency during interferential current therapy using an experimentally induced mechanical pain model in normal subjects. This study examined pain pressure sensitivities achieved when the amplitude-modulated frequency parameter was present (100Hz) and absent (0Hz). DESIGN: Randomised controlled crossover trial with repeated measures. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-six healthy volunteers (23 males, 23 females). INTERVENTIONS: Two interferential therapy protocols (with and without amplitude-modulated frequencies) were applied to the lumbar area on two different days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pressure pain thresholds over the lumbar area were measured before, during and after application of the interferential therapy protocols. RESULTS: A three-way analysis of variance with repeated measures failed to show any statistically significant difference between the two protocols in modifying pressure pain threshold values (mean difference 0.017kg/cm(2), 95% confidence interval -0.384 to 0.350, P=0.93). Statistically significant differences were identified (P<0.001) between measurements, indicating a comparable decrease in pain sensitivity in both groups. However, the increase in pressure pain thresholds (0.76kg/cm(2)) failed to reach a level of clinical importance. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of an amplitude-modulated frequency parameter to interferential therapy did not influence mechanical pain sensitivity in healthy subjects. Amplitude-modulated frequency is therefore unlikely to have a physiological hypoalgesic effect.
机译:目的:采用实验诱发的机械疼痛模型研究正常受试者在干扰电流治疗过程中调幅频率的镇痛作用。这项研究检查了当存在振幅调制频率参数(100Hz)和不存在振幅调制频率参数(0Hz)时获得的疼痛压力敏感性。设计:采用重复措施的随机对照交叉试验。地点:大学研究实验室。参与者:46位健康志愿者(男性23位,女性23位)。干预:在两个不同的日期对腰椎区域应用了两种干扰治疗方案(有和无调幅频率)。主要观察指标:在应用干涉治疗方案之前,之中和之后测量腰椎区域的压力疼痛阈值。结果:重复测量的方差的三向分析未能显示出两种方案在修改压力痛阈值方面的任何统计学显着性差异(平均差异为0.017kg / cm(2),95%置信区间为-0.384至0.350,P = 0.93)。在两次测量之间发现统计学上的显着差异(P <0.001),表明两组的疼痛敏感性均有相当的下降。但是,压力疼痛阈值(0.76kg / cm(2))的增加未能达到临床重要性。结论:在干扰治疗中增加调幅频率参数不会影响健康受试者的机械疼痛敏感性。因此,调幅频率不太可能具有生理上的止痛作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号