...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical science >Energy versus electron transfer in organic solar cells: a comparison of the photophysics of two indenofluorene: fullerene blend films
【24h】

Energy versus electron transfer in organic solar cells: a comparison of the photophysics of two indenofluorene: fullerene blend films

机译:有机太阳能电池中的能量与电子转移:两种茚并芴与富勒烯混合薄膜的光物理比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, we compare the photophysics and photovoltaic device performance of two indenofluorene based polymers: poly[2,8-(6,6,12,12-tetraoctylindenofluorene)-co-4,7-(2,1,3-benzothiodiazole](IF8BT)and poly[2,8-(6,6,12,12-tetraoctylindenofluorene)-co-5,5-(4',7'-di-2-thienyl-2',1',3'-benzothiodiazole] (IF8TBTT) blended with [6,6]-phenyl C_(61), butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM). Photovoltaic devices made with IF8TBTT exhibit greatly superior photocurrent generation and photovoltaic efficiency compared to those made with IF8BT. The poor device efficiency of IF8BT/ PCBM devices is shown to result from efficient, ultrafast singlet Forster energy transfer from IF8BT to PCBM, with the resultant PCBM singlet exciton lacking sufficient energy to drive charge photogeneration. The higher photocurrent generation observed for IF8TBTT/PCBM devices is shown to result from IF8TBTT's relatively weak, red-shifted photoluminescence characteristics, which switches off the polymer to fullerene singlet energy transfer pathway. As a consequence, IF8TBTT singlet excitons are able to drive charge separation at the polymer/fullerene interface, resulting in efficient photocurrent generation. These results are discussed in terms of the impact of donor/acceptor energy transfer upon photophysics and energetics of charge photogeneration in organic photovoltaic devices. The relevance of these results to the design of polymers for organic photovoltaic applications is also discussed, particularly with regard to explaining why highly luminescent polymers developed for organic light emitting diode applications often give relatively poor performance in organic photovoltaic devices.
机译:在本文中,我们比较了两种基于茚并芴的聚合物的光物理性质和光电器件性能:聚[2,8-(6,6,12,12-四辛基萘芴)-co-4,7-(2,1,3-苯并噻二唑) ](IF8BT)和聚[2,8-(6,6,12,12-四辛基萘芴)-co-5,5-(4',7'-di-2-thienyl-2',1',3' -[苯并噻二唑](IF8TBTT)与[6,6]-苯基C_(61)和丁酸甲酯(PCBM)混合,与IF8BT相比,用IF8TBTT制造的光伏器件具有更好的光电流产生能力和光伏效率。 IF8BT / PCBM器件的器件效率表明是从IF8BT到PCBM的高效,超快单峰Forster能量转移产生的,因此所得的PCBM单重态激子缺乏足够的能量来驱动电荷光生。是由IF8TBTT相对较弱的红移光致发光特性导致的,该特性将聚合物关闭为富勒烯单线态能传递途径。结果,IF8TBTT单线态激子能够驱动聚合物/富勒烯界面处的电荷分离,从而有效地产生光电流。根据供体/受体能量转移对有机光伏器件中光物理和电荷光生能的影响,讨论了这些结果。还讨论了这些结果与用于有机光伏应用的聚合物设计的相关性,特别是在解释为什么为有机发光二极管应用开发的高发光聚合物为什么在有机光伏器件中通常提供相对较差的性能方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号