首页> 外文期刊>Plant diversity and evolution ephylogeny, biogeography, structure and function >Nectar secretion and nectaries in basal angiosperms, magnoliids and non-core eudicots and a comparison with core eudicots
【24h】

Nectar secretion and nectaries in basal angiosperms, magnoliids and non-core eudicots and a comparison with core eudicots

机译:基底被子植物,乳突虫和非核心双子叶植物中的花蜜分泌和蜜腺,以及与核心双子叶植物的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This comparative study combines original results with a review of the literature summarizing our present knowledge as regards nectaries in angiosperm flowers. The focus is mainly on the basal angiosperms (ANITA or ANA grade and magnoliids) which are evaluated at the family (and genus) level. In most orders at least one genus has been studied for the first time or was re-investigated. In the second part a comparison is made with members of the core eudicots (at the order level). In basal angiosperms, in a number of families and genera nectar is offered, though not in great amounts and in addition to pollen as a reward. Nectary sites are the undifferentiated perianth, staminodes ("petals"), stamens, and carpels. Staminodial nectaries dominate. Receptacular disc nectaries are absent. As regards histology, all types of differentiation - epithelial, mesophyllary and trichomatic nectaries - can be found, the epithelial ones being the most common type of nectar secretion. The diverse structures, the rare occurrence, and scattered distribution of nectaries in the basal groups indicate convergent evolution. What is the selective advantage of nectar secretion in pollen flowers? It has been proposed (Nepi et al. 2009) that nectar provision is an adaptation to insects which were already accustomed to sugary exudates (such as pollination drops of gymnosperms). An alternative (or supplementary) approach results from the observation that nectar production is limited mainly to the female phase of the proterogynous flowers. It may be concluded (see Erbar & Leins 2013) that the nectar assures the attractiveness of the flower in the non-pollen presenting phase. In addition, during searching for the sparse nectar the insect may come into contact with each stigma thus compensating the economic disadvantage of a choricarpous compared to a coenocarpous gynoecium.
机译:这项比较研究将原始结果与文献综述相结合,总结了我们目前对被子植物花蜜的认识。重点主要放在基层被子植物(ANITA或ANA等级和木兰属)上,它们在家族(和属)水平上进行评估。在大多数订单中,至少一个属已被首次研究或被重新研究。在第二部分中,与核心双子叶植物的成员进行了比较(在订单级别)。在基础被子植物中,有许多家庭和属蜜被提供,尽管数量不多,除了花粉作为奖励。蜜腺部位是未分化的花被,退化雄蕊(“花瓣”),雄蕊和心皮。扁桃腺蜜占据主导地位。缺乏眼间盘蜜腺。就组织学而言,可以发现所有类型的分化-上皮,叶肉和三毛的蜜腺,其中上皮的是最常见的蜜腺分泌物类型。在基群中,蜜腺的结构多样,罕见,且蜜腺的分布分散,表明它们的趋同演化。花粉花中花蜜分泌的选择性优势是什么?有人提出(Nepi等人,2009年),提供花蜜是对已经习惯于含糖分泌物(例如裸子植物授粉滴)的昆虫的一种适应。一种替代的(或补充的)方法是由于观察到花蜜的生产主要限于雌性杂花的雌性期而产生的。可以得出结论(见Erbar和Leins,2013年),在非花粉呈现阶段,花蜜确保了花朵的吸引力。另外,在寻找稀疏花蜜的过程中,昆虫可能会与每个柱头接触,从而弥补了与掌结状的绞股蓝相比,鳞状的经济缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号