...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Engineering Research & Design: Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers >FUZZY RELATIONAL MODEL-BASED CONTROL APPLYING STOCHASTIC AND ITERATIVE METHODS FOR MODEL IDENTIFICATION
【24h】

FUZZY RELATIONAL MODEL-BASED CONTROL APPLYING STOCHASTIC AND ITERATIVE METHODS FOR MODEL IDENTIFICATION

机译:基于随机模型和迭代方法的模糊关系模型控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Most fuzzy controllers developed to date have been of the rule-based type. These controllers require considerable knowledge engineering to set up their rule base. An alternative approach is a fuzzy relational model-based controller (FRMBC), where a fuzzy relational model (FRM) of the process is imbedded into a conventional model-based controller. Constructing the FRM from a set of process data rather than from process knowledge reduces considerably the engineering effort of setting up a fuzzy controller. Several modelling methods to do so have been proposed in the literature. This paper looks at the multi-variable optimization methods of simulated annealing (SA), threshold accepting (TA) and iterative improvement for model formulation. Comparisons are made between the optimization methods described in the paper and more traditional methods of fuzzy model identification. The basis of the comparisons are the well known Box-Jenkins furnace data, and data from a simulated pH process. Amongst the things considered in the comparisons are model accuracy; the computational effort involved in identification; and the performance of the resulting models when included in a FRMBC. It was found that the multi-variable optimization methods described in this paper are far superior to traditional methods in terms of model accuracy, but are considerably slower. [References: 15]
机译:迄今为止开发的大多数模糊控制器都是基于规则的类型。这些控制器需要大量的知识工程来建立其规则库。一种替代方法是基于模糊关系模型的控制器(FRMBC),其中将过程的模糊关系模型(FRM)嵌入到常规的基于模型的控制器中。从一组过程数据而不是从过程知识中构造FRM可以大大减少设置模糊控制器的工程量。文献中已经提出了几种建模方法。本文着眼于模拟退火(SA),阈值接受(TA)和模型制定的迭代改进的多变量优化方法。本文所述的优化方法与更传统的模糊模型识别方法进行了比较。比较的基础是众所周知的Box-Jenkins炉数据和模拟pH过程的数据。比较中考虑的因素之一是模型的准确性;识别所涉及的计算工作;以及包含在FRMBC中的结果模型的性能。结果发现,本文描述的多变量优化方法在模型准确性方面远胜于传统方法,但速度慢得多。 [参考:15]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号