...
首页> 外文期刊>Pit & Quarry >Negligent inspection
【24h】

Negligent inspection

机译:过失检查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A private person who inspects a workplace can be held liable for injury or death due to hazards that should have been found and addressed. That is effectively what the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia recently held in answering a certified question posed by a U.S. Court of Appeals in need of advice on state law. In Bragg v. U.S., plaintiffs sought damages for the deaths of two miners who succumbed to carbon monoxide in a coal mine fire. The case was brought against the U.S. government under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) for negligent inspection by MSHA.
机译:检查工作场所的私人可能会因应发现并解决的危害而对伤害或死亡负责。这实际上是西弗吉尼亚州最高上诉法院在回答美国上诉法院提出的需要州法咨询的认证问题时所持的观点。在Bragg诉美国案中,原告要求赔偿两名在煤矿火灾中死于一氧化碳的矿工的死亡。此案是根据《联邦侵权索赔法》(FTCA)向美国政府提起的,由MSHA进行过疏忽检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号