...
首页> 外文期刊>Plant and Soil >Morphological and physiological plasticity of plant roots when nutrients are both spatially and temporally heterogeneous
【24h】

Morphological and physiological plasticity of plant roots when nutrients are both spatially and temporally heterogeneous

机译:营养物质在空间和时间上都是异质的,植物根的形态和生理可塑性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Roots express morphological and physiological plasticity that may be adaptations for efficient nutrient capture when soil nutrients are heterogeneous in space and time. In terms of nutrient capture per unit of carbon invested in roots, morphological plasticity should be more advantageous when nutrient patches are stable in time, and physiological plasticity when nutrients are variable in time. Here we examined both traits in two Pinus species, two Liquidambar species, two Solidago species, Ailanthus altissima and Callistephus chinesis, grown in pots where the same total level of nutrient addition was provided in a factorial experiment with different levels of spatial and temporal variability. Total plant root growth, Root/Shoot ratios and morphological plasticity were less when nutrients were temporally variable instead of stable. Physiological plasticity was more variable than morphological across treatments and species and was not predictably greater when nutrient supply was pulsed instead of constant. Large variability, especially in physiological plasticity, was observed, and physiological plasticity was greater in non-woody than in woody species. Our results suggest that the two traits differ in environmental factors that control their expression, and that the nature of nutrient patchiness may have more direct impact on the evolution of morphological than physiological plasticity.
机译:根系表现出形态和生理可塑性,当土壤养分在空间和时间上不均匀时,可能是有效养分捕获的适应手段。就根部投入的每单位碳的养分捕获而言,当养分块及时稳定时,形态可塑性应更具优势;当养分随时间变化时,形态可塑性应更具优势。在这里,我们研究了在盆栽植物中生长的两个松属物种,两个枫香属物种,两个Solidago物种,臭椿和Callistephus chinesis的两个性状,在因果试验中提供了相同水平的总营养添加,但水平和时间的变化程度不同。当养分随时间变化而不是稳定时,总的植物根生长,根/射比和形态可塑性都较小。在不同处理和不同物种之间,生理可塑性比形态学更易变,并且当脉冲供给养分而不是恒定时,其可预测性不会更大。观察到较大的变异性,特别是在生理可塑性方面,并且非木质植物的生理可塑性比木质物种更大。我们的结果表明,这两个性状在控制其表达的环境因素方面有所不同,营养斑块的性质可能比生理可塑性对形态演变具有更直接的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号