...
首页> 外文期刊>Physical Review, A. Atomic, molecular, and optical physics >Comment on 'Scheme for multistep photoionization of atoms' - art. no. 047401
【24h】

Comment on 'Scheme for multistep photoionization of atoms' - art. no. 047401

机译:评论“原子多步光电离的方案”-艺术。没有。 047401

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In a recent paper, Bo Liu and Xi-Jing Ning [Phys. Rev. A 64, 013401 (2001)] compared a multistep photoionization scheme where the resonant laser pulses act in consecutive order with one where the same laser pulses act simultaneously. Their conclusion is that the "consecutive" scheme is much more (several orders of magnitude) efficient than the "simultaneous" one, which they call traditional. We show, however, that optimum conditions for efficient photoionization with the simultaneous (or traditional) scheme are very different from those assumed by the authors. So the difference between two schemes, in-terms of efficiency, is of much lower importance, if any, than that believed by the authors. [References: 6]
机译:在最近的一篇论文中,刘波和宁希京[Phys。 Rev.A 64,013401(2001)]比较了多步光电离方案,其中谐振激光脉冲以连续顺序起作用,而相同激光脉冲同时起作用。他们的结论是,“连续”方案的效率(几个数量级)要比“同步”方案(他们称之为传统方案)高得多。但是,我们表明,同时(或传统)方案进行有效光电离的最佳条件与作者所假设的条件大不相同。因此,在效率方面,两种方案之间的差异(如果有的话)的重要性要比作者认为的重要得多。 [参考:6]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号