首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Comparative effectiveness of rosuvastatin versus simvastatin in primary prevention among new users: A cohort study in the French national health insurance database
【24h】

Comparative effectiveness of rosuvastatin versus simvastatin in primary prevention among new users: A cohort study in the French national health insurance database

机译:瑞舒伐他汀与辛伐他汀在新使用者中一级预防的比较效果:法国国家健康保险数据库中的一项队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: Using the French claims database (Système National d'Information Inter-Régimes de l'Assurance Maladie) linked to the hospital discharge database (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information), this observational study compared the effectiveness of rosuvastatin and simvastatin prescribed at doses with close LDL-cholesterol-lowering potency on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (CCDs) in primary prevention. Methods: This historical cohort included patients with no prior CCD, aged 40-79years, who initiated statin therapy with rosuvastatin 5mg or simvastatin 20mg in 2008-2009 in general practice. Follow-up started after a 1-year period used to select patients who regularly received the initial treatment. In an intention-to-treat analysis, patients were followed up to December 2011. In a per-protocol analysis, they were censored prematurely when they discontinued their initial treatment. Adjustment for baseline covariates (age, deprivation index, comedications, comorbidities, prior hospital admissions) was carried out by a Cox proportional hazards model. In the per-protocol analysis, estimation was done by "inverse probability of censoring weighting" using additional time-dependent covariates. Analyses were gender-specific. Results: A total of 106941 patients initiated statin therapy with rosuvastatin 5mg and 56860 with simvastatin 20mg. Mean follow-up was 35.8months. For both genders and both types of analyses, the difference in incidence rates of mortality and/or CCD between rosuvastatin 5mg and simvastatin 20mg users was not statistically significant after adjustment (e.g., for CCD and/or mortality in men, in intention-to-treat analysis HR=0.94 [95% CI=0.85-1.04], in per-protocol analysis HR=0.98 [0.87-1.10]). Conclusions: The results of this real-life study based on medico-administrative databases do not support preferential prescription of rosuvastatin compared to simvastatin for primary prevention of CCD.
机译:目的:使用与医院出院数据库(计划信息系统化计划)链接的法国索赔数据库(国家医疗系统信息系统),该观察性研究比较了瑞舒伐他汀和辛伐他汀处方的有效性在一级预防中以接近降低LDL胆固醇的剂量治疗全因死亡率以及心脑血管疾病(CC​​D)。方法:该历史队列包括未曾接受CCD的年龄在40-79岁之间的患者,他们在2008-2009年开始采用罗舒伐他汀5mg或辛伐他汀20mg进行他汀类药物治疗。在选择了定期接受初始治疗的患者的1年期后开始随访。在意向性治疗分析中,对患者进行了随访,直至2011年12月。在按方案分析中,对中止治疗的患者进行了过早检查。通过Cox比例风险模型对基线协变量(年龄,剥夺指数,喜剧,合并症,入院前)进行调整。在按协议分析中,估计是通过使用其他时间相关协变量通过“审查加权的逆概率”完成的。分析是针对性别的。结果:共有106941名患者开始接受他汀类药物的瑞舒伐他汀5mg治疗和860例辛伐他汀20mg治疗。平均随访35.8个月。对于男女和两种类型的分析,调整后的瑞舒伐他汀5mg和辛伐他汀20mg使用者的死亡率和/或CCD的发生率差异均无统计学意义(例如,男性的CCD和/或死亡率,在按方案分析中,HR = 0.94 [95%CI = 0.85-1.04] HR = 0.98 [0.87-1.10])。结论:这项基于药物管理数据库的现实生活研究结果不支持瑞舒伐他汀相对于辛伐他汀用于CCD一级预防的优先处方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号