首页> 外文期刊>American journal of cardiovascular drugs: drugs, devices, and other interventions >Comparative Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonists: A High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched New Users Cohort Study in the French National Healthcare Data System SNDS
【24h】

Comparative Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonists: A High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched New Users Cohort Study in the French National Healthcare Data System SNDS

机译:Dabigatran或Rivaroxaban与维生素K拮抗剂的比较现实效力和安全性:高维倾向评分匹配法国国家医疗数据系统SNDS的新用户队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Clinical trials have indicated that the direct-acting oral anticoagulants dabigatran and rivaroxaban have better risk/benefit profiles than do vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Objective Our objective was to compare the 1-year real-life risk of major clinical events with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus VKAs for NVAF. Methods This was a high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS)-matched cohort study of new users of dabigatran, rivaroxaban or VKAs for NVAF in the French national healthcare systems database in 2013 followed-up for 1 year [22]. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for clinical events and death were determined during exposure. Results In 2013, a total of 103,101 new anticoagulant users had definite NVAF: 44,653 VKA, 27,060 dabigatran, and 31,388 rivaroxaban. In matched populations, HRs were as follows for dabigatran versus VKAs (20,489 per group): stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) 0.75 (95% CI 0.63-0.88), clinically relevant bleeding (CRB) 0.58 (95% CI 0.51-0.66), hemorrhagic stroke (HS) 0.22 (95% CI 0.14-0.36), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) 0.98 (95% CI 0.80-1.19), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.95), death 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.82), composite (any of the above) 0.71 (95% CI 0.66-0.76). For matched rivaroxaban versus VKA (23,053 per group) HRs were as follows: SSE 0.98 (95% CI 0.85-1.14), CRB 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.92), HS 0.65 (95% CI 0.49-0.87), GIB 1.08 (95% CI 0.90-1.30), ACS 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-1.00), death 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.84), composite 0.84 (95% CI 0.79-0.89). Numbers needed to treat to observe one fewer death were 49 +/- 0.05 with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus VKAs. Conclusion Consistent with results from clinical trials and other observational studies, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were at least as effective and safer than VKAs for the prevention of thromboembolic events in NVAF over 1 year in the French population. Study registration European Medicines Agency EUPAS 13017 () Clinicaltrials.gov id NCT02785354.
机译:背景技术临床试验表明,直接作用的口服抗凝血剂Dabigatran和Rivaroxaban比维生素K拮抗剂(VKAS)具有更好的风险/益处曲线,用于在非瓣膜心房颤动(NVAF)中的卒中预防。目的是我们的目标是将主要临床活动的1年现实生活风险与Dabigatran或Rivaroxaban与NVAF的VKA相比进行比较。方法这是2013年法国国家医疗保健系统数据库中的Dabigatran,Rivaroxaban或VKA的新用户的高维倾向评分(HDPS) - 用于NVAF的新用户的研究,随访1年[22]。危险比率(HRS)在暴露期间确定临床事件和死亡的95%置信区间(CIS)。结果2013年,共有103,101名新的抗凝血用户明确NVAF:44,653 vka,27,060达比冈和31,388 rivaroxaban。在匹配的群体中,HRS如Dabigatran对VKAS(每组20,489):中风和全身栓塞(SSE)0.75(95%CI 0.63-0.88),临床相关的出血(CRB)0.58(95%CI 0.51-0.66) ,出血性卒中(HS)0.22(95%CI 0.14-0.36),胃肠出血(GIB)0.98(95%CI 0.80-19),急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)0.79(95%CI 0.65-0.95),死亡0.74( 95%CI 0.67-0.82),复合材料(以上任何一种)0.71(95%CI 0.66-0.76)。对于匹配的RIVAROXABAN VKA(每组23,053),HRS如下:SSE 0.98(95%CI 0.85-1.14),CRB 0.83(95%CI 0.75-0.92),HS 0.65(95%CI 0.49-0.87),GIB 1.08 (95%CI 0.90-1.30),ACS 0.84(95%CI 0.71-1.00),死亡0.77(95%CI 0.71-0.84),复合0.84(95%CI 0.79-0.89)。治疗较少死亡所需的数量是Dabigatran或Rivaroxaban与VKAS的49 +/- 0.05。结论与临床试验和其他观察研究的结果一致,Dabigatran和Rivaroxaban至少与VKA有效和更安全,用于预防法国人群1年内的NVAF血栓栓塞事件。学习注册欧洲药物局eupas 13017()ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02785354。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号