...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Association between anti-TNF-α therapy and interstitial lung disease.
【24h】

Association between anti-TNF-α therapy and interstitial lung disease.

机译:抗TNF-α治疗与间质性肺疾病之间的关联。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) agents have been hypothesized to increase the risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD), including its most severe manifestation, pulmonary fibrosis.We conducted a cohort study among autoimmune disease patients who were members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 1998-2007. We obtained therapies from pharmacy data and diagnoses of ILD from review of X-ray and computed tomography reports. We compared new users of anti-TNF-α agents to new users of non-biologic therapies using Cox proportional hazards analysis to adjust for baseline propensity scores and time-varying use of glucocorticoids. We also made head-to-head comparisons between anti-TNF-α agents.Among the 8417 persons included in the analysis, 38 (0.4%) received a diagnostic code for ILD by the end of follow-up, including 23 of 4200 (0.5%) who used anti-TNF-α during study follow-up, and 15 of 5423 (0.3%) who used only non-biologic therapies. The age-standardized and gender-standardized incidence rate of ILD, per 100 person-years, was 0.21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-0.43] for rheumatoid arthritis and appreciably lower for other autoimmune diseases. Compared with the use of non-biologic therapies, use of anti-TNF-α therapy was not associated with a diagnosis of ILD among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95%CI 0.51-2.07), nor did head-to-head comparisons across anti-TNF-α agents suggest important differences in risk, although the number of cases available for analysis was limited.The study provides evidence that compared with non-biologic therapies, anti-TNF-α therapy does not increase the occurrence of ILD among patients with autoimmune diseases and informs research design of future safety studies of ILD.
机译:有人假设抗肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)药物会增加间质性肺病(ILD)的风险,包括最严重的表现为肺纤维化。我们对参加该研究的自身免疫性疾病患者进行了一项队列研究Kaiser Permanente北加利福尼亚,1998-2007年。我们从药房数据中获得了疗法,并从X射线和计算机断层扫描报告的回顾中获得了ILD的诊断。我们使用Cox比例风险分析将抗TNF-α药物的新用户与非生物疗法的新用户进行了比较,以调整基线倾向评分和糖皮质激素的时变使用。我们还对抗TNF-α药物进行了面对面的比较。在分析中包括的8417名患者中,有38名(0.4%)在随访结束时获得了ILD诊断代码,包括4200名中的23名(在研究随访期间使用抗TNF-α的患者占0.5%),仅在使用非生物疗法的5423人中有15人(占0.3%)。类风湿性关节炎的年龄标准化和性别标准化发病率(每100人年)为0.21 [95%置信区间(CI)0-0.43],而其他自身免疫性疾病则更低。与使用非生物疗法相比,在类风湿关节炎患者中,使用抗TNF-α疗法与ILD的诊断无关联(风险比调整为1.03; 95%CI 0.51-2.07),且尽管可用于分析的病例数量有限,但各种抗TNF-α药物的正面比较表明风险存在重大差异。该研究提供的证据表明,与非生物疗法相比,抗TNF-α疗法不会增加自身免疫性疾病患者中ILD的发生,并为ILD未来安全性研究的研究设计提供依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号