...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Drug switching patterns among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis using COX-2 specific inhibitors and non-specific NSAIDs.
【24h】

Drug switching patterns among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis using COX-2 specific inhibitors and non-specific NSAIDs.

机译:使用COX-2特异性抑制剂和非特异性NSAID在类风湿性关节炎和骨关节炎患者之间进行药物转换。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare RA and OA patients' time-to-switch after newly initiating treatment with three most commonly used non-specific (NS)-NSAIDs and two COX-2 inhibitors, celecoxib and rofecoxib. METHODS: Managed care enrollees newly prescribed celecoxib, rofecoxib, ibuprofen, naproxen or diclofenac were identified. Time to switch to a different NS-NSAID or COX-2 specific inhibitor was determined using time-to-event analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) after controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: The time to 25% of the cohort switching was longer for rofecoxib and celecoxib (159 and 205 days respectively) compared to the three NS-NSAIDs (49-78 days). Patients were at the highest risk of switching within the first 100 days of therapy. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the OR for switching to another NS-NSAID or COX-2 specific inhibitor ranged from 1.74 to 2.35 for the three NS-NSAIDs compared to celecoxib (all comparisons, p < 0.01). Similar findings were obtained when comparing rofecoxib to each of the three NS-NSAIDS (all comparisons, p < 0.01). When COX-2 inhibitors combined were compared to NS-NSAIDS combined, the OR for switching was 1.53 (95% confidence interval=1.42-1.65; p < 0.01) after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on the COX-2 specific inhibitors (celecoxib and rofecoxib) were significantly less likely to switch their therapy than patients on NS-NSAIDS (ibuprofen, naproxen and diclofenac). These results suggest that COX-2 specific inhibitors may be a more effective treatment option when compared with NS-NSAIDs in usual clinical practice.
机译:目的:比较RA和OA患者新开始用三种最常用的非特异性(NS)-NSAID和两种COX-2抑制剂塞来昔布和罗非考昔治疗后的转换时间。方法:确定新开处方的塞来昔布,罗非昔布,布洛芬,萘普生或双氯芬酸的管理性护理参与者。使用事件发生时间分析法确定了切换至不同NS-NSAID或COX-2特异性抑制剂的时间,并在控制潜在的混杂因素后,使用Cox比例风险模型估算优势比(OR)。结果:与三个NS-NSAIDs(49-78天)相比,罗非昔布和塞来昔布达到队列转换的25%的时间更长(分别为159天和205天)。在治疗的前100天内患者处于最高切换风险。调整了潜在的混杂因素后,与塞来昔布相比,这三种NS-NSAID的切换为另一种NS-NSAID或COX-2特异性抑制剂的OR范围为1.74至2.35(所有比较,p <0.01)。将罗非考昔与三种NS-NSAIDS中的每一种进行比较均获得了相似的发现(所有比较,p <0.01)。当将组合COX-2抑制剂与组合NS-NSAIDS进行比较时,调整潜在混杂因素后,转换的OR为1.53(95%置信区间= 1.42-1.65; p <0.01)。结论:与NS-NSAIDS患者(布洛芬,萘普生和双氯芬酸)相比,接受COX-2特异性抑制剂(塞来昔布和罗非昔布)治疗的患者转用治疗的可能性明显更低。这些结果表明,与常规临床实践中的NS-NSAIDs相比,COX-2特异性抑制剂可能是更有效的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号