首页> 外文期刊>Chemical engineering journal >Performance comparison of two anammox reactors:SBR and UBF
【24h】

Performance comparison of two anammox reactors:SBR and UBF

机译:两种厌氧氨氧化反应器SBR和UBF的性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The performance of two selected high rate anammox reactors,i.e.sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and an upflow biofilter (UBF) were compared operating them simultaneously at 30 °C.The sludge from anaerobic digester of a municipal wastewater treatment plant was used for inoculation and synthetic wastewater was fed to both reactors during the experiment.During start-up,the nitrogen loading rate (NLR) was increased gradually from an initial 140 to 560 mg/1 day.The comparison of the performance revealed that the NLRs of SBR (2.7 g/1 day) and UBF (2.5 g/1 day) were far higher than those of the traditional nitrification/denitrification process.The biomass production of SBR outcompeted that of UBF.SBR took a longer time for start-up,i.e.about 57 days compared with 31 days of UBF.Moreover,SBR tolerated smaller pulse of substrate concentration and hydraulic load,showing a weaker stability compared with UBF.
机译:比较了两个选定的高速率厌氧氨氧化反应器,即顺序分批反应器(SBR)和上流生物滤池(UBF)在30°C下同时运行的性能。将城市污水处理厂厌氧消化池的污泥用于接种和实验期间将合成废水送入两个反应器中。在启动过程中,氮负荷率(NLR)从最初的140毫克/天逐渐增加到560毫克/ 1天。性能比较表明,丁苯橡胶(NBR)(2.7 g / 1天)和UBF(2.5 g / 1天)远高于传统的硝化/反硝化过程.SBR的生物质生产胜过UBF.SBR的启动时间较长,即约57与UBF的31天相比,SBR可以承受更多的天数。此外,SBR可以承受较小的底物浓度和水力负荷脉冲,与UBF相比,稳定性较弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号