首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Application of marginal structural models in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: A systematic review
【24h】

Application of marginal structural models in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: A systematic review

机译:边际结构模型在药物流行病学研究中的应用:系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: We systematically reviewed pharmacoepidemiologic studies published in 2012 that used inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimation of marginal structural models (MSM) to estimate the effect from a time-varying treatment. Methods: Potential studies were retrieved through a citation search within Web of Science and a keyword search within PubMed. Eligibility of retrieved studies was independently assessed by at least two reviewers. One reviewer performed data extraction, and a senior epidemiologist confirmed the extracted information for all eligible studies. Results: Twenty pharmacoepidemiologic studies were eligible for data extraction. The majority of reviewed studies did not report whether the positivity assumption was checked. Six studies performed intention-to-treat analyses, but none of them reported adherence levels after treatment initiation. Eight studies chose an as-treated analytic strategy, but only one of them reported modeling the multiphase of treatment use. Almost all studies performing as-treated analyses chose the most recent treatment status as the functional form of exposure in the outcome model. Nearly half of the studies reported that the IPW estimate was substantially different from the estimate derived from a standard regression model. Conclusions: The use of IPW method to control for time-varying confounding is increasing in medical literature. However, reporting of the application of the technique is variable and suboptimal. It may be prudent to develop best practices in reporting complex methods in epidemiologic research.
机译:目的:我们系统地回顾了2012年发表的药物流行病学研究,该研究使用边缘结构模型(MSM)的逆概率加权(IPW)估计来估计时变治疗的效果。方法:通过Web of Science中的引文搜索和PubMed中的关键字搜索来检索潜在研究。检索的研究的资格由至少两名审阅者独立评估。一位审阅者进行了数据提取,一位高级流行病学家确认了所有合格研究的提取信息。结果:二十项药物流行病学研究符合数据提取的条件。大多数审查的研究都没有报告是否检查了阳性假设。六项研究进行了意向性治疗分析,但均未报告治疗开始后的依从性水平。八项研究选择了一种按原样治疗的分析策略,但只有其中一项报告称对治疗使用的多阶段建模。几乎所有进行治疗分析的研究都选择最新的治疗状态作为结果模型中暴露的功能形式。近一半的研究报告说,IPW估算值与标准回归模型得出的估算值有很大不同。结论:在医学文献中,越来越多地使用IPW方法来控制时变混杂。然而,该技术应用的报告是可变的且不是最佳的。在报告流行病学研究中的复杂方法时,最好开发最佳实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号