...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Cancer risk with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) inhibitors: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab using patient level data.
【24h】

Cancer risk with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) inhibitors: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab using patient level data.

机译:肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF)抑制剂的癌症风险:使用患者水平数据对阿达木单抗,依那西普和英夫利昔单抗的随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: Uncertain short- and long-term cancer risks with anti-TNF therapies is a concern, and led to a recent black box warning. This meta-analysis, requested by the European Medicines Agency, aimed at better assessing short-term risks by using meta-analytic techniques based on individual patient data from all corporate-sponsored randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab. METHODS: All 74 RCTs of TNF inhibitors of at least 4 weeks duration were provided to independent investigators, including case narratives for events occurring between trial start until 30 days after planned end of treatment and indicating a possible cancer. Relative risks were estimated using Bayesian piecewise exponential models. RESULTS: One hundred thirty (0.84%) of 15,418 individuals randomized to anti-TNF therapy were diagnosed with cancer, compared to 48 (0.64%) of 7486 individuals randomized to comparators. The relative risks associated with all anti-TNF were 0.99 (95%CI 0.61-1.68) for cancers excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), and 2.02 (95%CI 1.11-3.95) for NMSC. There were indications of differences in the relative risks for the three anti-TNF drugs, but also of differences across the cancer rates in the three comparator arms for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a reassuring overall short-term risk, we could neither refute nor verify that individual anti-TNF therapies affect the short-term clinical emergence of cancer. Despite representing the best available evidence, statistical precision, and differences in baseline cancer risk and reporting detail between trials of adilumumab, etanercept, and infliximab hampered distinction of drug-specific from trial effects, illustrating the challenges in safety-assessments using RCT meta-analyses. Long-term risk assessment requires observational studies.
机译:目的:抗TNF疗法不确定短期和长期的癌症风险,这引起了人们的关注,并导致了最近的黑匣子警告。欧洲药物管理局要求进行的这项荟萃分析旨在通过基于荟萃分析技术,根据来自所有公司赞助的阿达木单抗,依那西普和英夫利昔单抗的个体患者数据,更好地评估短期风险。方法:将至少持续4周的所有74种TNF抑制剂的RCT均提供给独立的研究人员,包括从试验开始到计划治疗结束后30天之间发生的事件的病例说明,并指出可能的癌症。使用贝叶斯分段指数模型估计相对风险。结果:随机分配到抗TNF治疗的15418例患者中有一百三十(0.84%)位被诊断出癌症,而随机分配给比较者的7486例中有48位(0.64%)被诊断为癌症。除非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)外,与所有抗TNF相关的相对风险分别为0.99(95%CI 0.61-1.68)和NMSC 2.02(95%CI 1.11-3.95)。有迹象表明三种抗TNF药物的相对风险存在差异,但阿达木单抗,依那西普和英夫利昔单抗的三个比较组的癌症发生率也存在差异。结论:尽管总体的短期风险令人放心,我们既不能驳斥也不能证实个别的抗TNF治疗会影响癌症的短期临床出现。尽管adilumumab,etanercept和infliximab试验之间的最佳证据,统计学准确性以及基线癌症风险和报告细节的差异,但仍阻碍了药物特异性与试验效果的区分,这说明了使用RCT荟萃分析进行安全性评估的挑战。长期风险评估需要观察研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号