【24h】

Starting the conversation.

机译:开始对话。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has drawn increasing attention since the passing of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. In section 1013 of this Act, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) was authorized to conduct and support research with a focus on outcomes, comparative clinical effectiveness, and appropriateness of Pharmaceuticals, devices, and health care services. The interest in this research has skyrocketed with the dollar1.1 billion Federal investment in CER with the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). In 2003, MEDLINE reports 20 articles using the term "comparative effectiveness"; twice as many articles published using this term in the first month of 2011 alone. But, what is CER, and is this research really something new? A number of organizations have defined CER, but two are worth particular mention.
机译:自2003年《医疗保险处方药,改进和现代化法案》通过以来,比较有效性研究(CER)引起了越来越多的关注。在该法案的第1013条中,授权医疗研究与质量局(AHRQ)进行和支持侧重于结果,比较的临床有效性以及药物,设备和医疗保健服务的适用性的研究。随着2009年美国复苏与再投资法案(ARRA)对CER的11亿美元投资,对这项研究的兴趣激增。在2003年,MEDLINE报告了20篇使用“比较效果”一词的文章;仅在2011年第一个月,使用该术语发表的文章就增加了两倍。但是,什么是CER,这项研究真的是新事物吗?许多组织已经定义了CER,但是其中两个值得特别提及。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号