首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >India and China within Perennial Philosophy. A Central Theme of Philosophical Historiography between the 17 th and 18 th Centuries
【24h】

India and China within Perennial Philosophy. A Central Theme of Philosophical Historiography between the 17 th and 18 th Centuries

机译:多年生哲学中的印度和中国。第17个和18个 th 世纪之间的哲学史学的中心主题

获取原文
       

摘要

The paper deals with both historiography and intercultural philosophy, trying to offer a detailed account of the long European interpretation of other civilizations, namely India and China, from the Renaissance neo-platonic thinkers to the late Enlightenment. Neo-platonism provided the most influential historiogaphic model for at least two centuries - “perennial philosophy.” According to this model, all philosophies and philosophers – of the world and of all times – were part of an ancient lineage of wisdom, that went back to God or at least the patriarchs. India and China were inserted within this historiographic model not without several hermeneutic and chronological problems. The life of this model covered all centuries I investigated, undergoing continuous new interpretations and drastic changes also caused by these two civilizations. The real crisis of this model may be found in Heumann and Brücker, representatives of the anti-Wolfian German Philosophy. However, I claim that, even if harshly criticized, the perennial philosophy model survived in new ways through the 19th century.
机译:本文涉及史学和跨文化哲学,试图详细说明欧洲从文艺复兴时期的新柏拉图式思想家到后期启蒙运动对印度和中国等其他文明的长期解释。新柏拉图主义至少在两个世纪以来提供了最有影响力的历史学模型-“常年哲学”。根据这种模式,世界上所有时代的所有哲学家和哲学家都属于古老的智慧世系的一部分,这些智慧世系可以追溯到上帝或至少祖先。印度和中国被插入到这种史学模型中,而并非没有几个解释学和年代学问题。这个模型的生命涵盖了我研究的所有世纪,经历了不断的新解释和这两个文明所带来的巨大变化。这种模式的真正危机可以在反沃尔夫德国哲学的代表Heumann和Brücker中找到。但是,我声称,即使遭到严厉批评,多年生哲学模型还是以新的方式在19世纪得以幸存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号