...
首页> 外文期刊>Health >Correlation between the Childhood-Asthma Control Test and the Criterion for Clinical Asthma Control
【24h】

Correlation between the Childhood-Asthma Control Test and the Criterion for Clinical Asthma Control

机译:儿童哮喘控制测试与临床哮喘控制标准之间的相关性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Setting: Three pediatric pneumatologist offices in Bucaramanga, Colombia. Objective: To establish the concordance between medical criteria and the Childhood-Asthma Control Test (cACT). Design: Study of the assessment of diagnostic technology using transverse sampling. 127 asthma patients aged between 4 and 11 years and their parents filled before clinical evaluation made by a pediatric pneumologist. Patients were classified as controlled or not controlled. Criteria validity was established comparing this classification using Cohen’s kappa and performance indicators according to ROC analysis. Results: 78% of the patients were controlled; patients who are not controlled have a higher score in cACT (mean difference: 3.25 points). Concordance among cACT subscales is acceptable (ρ = 0.554). cACT’s sensitivity was 53.6%, specificity 78.8%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 2.53, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.59. The best cut-off point is 15, with 98% sensitivity, a specificity of 14.3%, LR+ in 1.14, and LR- in 0.14. Conclusions: cACT is a valid tool to determine asthma control in children without replacing medical criteria or other clinical tests. In populations with difficult access to high complexity services, it is useful to decide whether urgent referral to the specialist is necessary.
机译:地点:哥伦比亚布卡拉曼加的三个儿科肺科医师办公室。目的:建立医学标准与儿童哮喘控制测试(cACT)之间的一致性。设计:使用横向采样对诊断技术进行评估的研究。 127名4至11岁的哮喘患者及其父母在小儿肺炎医师进行临床评估之前就已接受治疗。将患者分为对照或非对照。根据ROC分析,使用Cohen的kappa和效果指标比较了此分类,从而建立了标准有效性。结果:78%的患者得到了控制;未得到控制的患者的cACT得分较高(平均差异:3.25分)。 cACT分量表之间的一致性是可以接受的(ρ= 0.554)。 cACT的敏感性为53.6%,特异性为78.8%,阳性似然比(LR +)为2.53,阴性似然比(LR-)为0.59。最佳截止点是15,灵敏度为98%,特异性为14.3%,LR +为1.14,LR-为0.14。结论:cACT是确定儿童哮喘控制情况的有效工具,无需替代医学标准或其他临床测试。在难以获得高复杂性服务的人群中,决定是否有必要紧急转介专家是很有用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号