首页> 外文期刊>Chinese journal of cancer >Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety
【24h】

Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety

机译:肝癌伴单发肿瘤和微血管侵犯的根治性切除术后辅助性经导管动脉化疗栓塞:一项疗效和安全性随机临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The optimal strategy for adjuvant therapy after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion (MVI) is controversial. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) after hepatectomy versus hepatectomy alone in HCC patients with a solitary tumor?≥?5?cm and MVI. Methods In this randomized, open-labeled, phase III trial, HCC patients with a solitary tumor?≥?5?cm and MVI were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 1–2 cycles of adjuvant TACE after hepatectomy (Hepatectomy-TACE) or hepatectomy alone (Hepatectomy Alone). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse events. Results Between June 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, 250 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the Hepatectomy-TACE group ( n =?125) or the Hepatectomy Alone group ( n =?125). Clinicopathological characteristics were balanced between the two groups. The median follow-up time from randomization was 37.5?months [interquartile range 18.3–48.2?months]. The median DFS was significantly longer in the Hepatectomy-TACE group than in the Hepatectomy Alone group [17.45?months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.99–29.14) vs. 9.27?months (95% CI 6.05–13.70), hazard ratio [HR]?=?0.70 (95% CI 0.52–0.95), P =?0.020], respectively. The median OS was also significantly longer in the Hepatectomy-TACE group than in the Hepatectomy Alone group [44.29?months (95% CI 25.99–62.58) vs. 22.37?months (95% CI 10.84–33.91), HR?=?0.68 (95% CI 0.48–0.97), P =?0.029]. Treatment-related adverse events were more frequently observed in the Hepatectomy-TACE group, although these were generally mild and manageable. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events in both groups were neutropenia and liver dysfunction. Conclusion Hepatectomy followed by adjuvant TACE is an appropriate option after radical resection in HCC patients with solitary tumor?≥?5?cm and MVI, with acceptable toxicity.
机译:背景技术对于单发肿瘤和微血管浸润(MVI)的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者,根治性切除术后辅助治疗的最佳策略尚存争议。该试验评估了肝切除术与单纯肝切除术在HCC≥5?cm和MVI的肝癌患者中辅助行经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)的有效性和安全性。方法在这项随机,开放标签的III期试验中,将具有≥5?cm单发肿瘤和MVI的HCC患者随机分配(1:1)接受肝切除术后1-2个周期的辅助性TACE。 TACE)或单独进行肝切除术(单独进行肝切除术)。主要终点是无病生存期(DFS)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)和不良事件。结果在2009年6月1日至2012年12月31日期间,共有250例患者被随机分为肝切除术-TACE组(n = 125)或仅肝切除术组(n = 125)。两组之间的临床病理特征是平衡的。随机分组的中位随访时间为37.5个月(四分位间距18.3至48.2个月)。肝切除术-TACE组的中位DFS明显长于单纯肝切除术组[17.45?个月(95%置信区间[CI] 11.99–29.14])和9.27?个月(95%CI 6.05–13.70),危险比[HR]≤0.70(95%CI 0.52-0.95),P =≤0.020]。与单纯肝切除术组相比,肝切除术-TACE组的中位OS也明显长于单独肝切除术组[44.29?个月(95%CI 25.99–62.58)与22.37?个月(95%CI 10.84–33.91),HR == 0.68”。 (95%CI 0.48–0.97),P =?0.029]。在肝切除术-TACE组中,与治疗相关的不良事件更为常见,尽管这些症状通常较轻且易于控制。两组中最常见的3级或4级不良事件是中性粒细胞减少和肝功能障碍。结论对于孤立性肿瘤≥5?cm且MVI的HCC患者,根治性切除术后行肝切除+辅助TACE治疗是适当的选择,且毒性反应可接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号