首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Communications >Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety
【24h】

Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety

机译:肝癌伴单发肿瘤和微血管侵犯的根治性切除术后辅助性经导管动脉化疗栓塞:一项疗效和安全性随机临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

The optimal strategy for adjuvant therapy after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion (MVI) is controversial. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) after hepatectomy versus hepatectomy alone in HCC patients with a solitary tumor ≥ 5 cm and MVI. In this randomized, open-labeled, phase III trial, HCC patients with a solitary tumor ≥ 5 cm and MVI were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 1–2 cycles of adjuvant TACE after hepatectomy (Hepatectomy-TACE) or hepatectomy alone (Hepatectomy Alone). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse events. Between June 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, 250 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the Hepatectomy-TACE group (n = 125) or the Hepatectomy Alone group (n = 125). Clinicopathological characteristics were balanced between the two groups. The median follow-up time from randomization was 37.5 months [interquartile range 18.3–48.2 months]. The median DFS was significantly longer in the Hepatectomy-TACE group than in the Hepatectomy Alone group [17.45 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.99–29.14) vs. 9.27 months (95% CI 6.05–13.70), hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70 (95% CI 0.52–0.95), P = 0.020], respectively. The median OS was also significantly longer in the Hepatectomy-TACE group than in the Hepatectomy Alone group [44.29 months (95% CI 25.99–62.58) vs. 22.37 months (95% CI 10.84–33.91), HR = 0.68 (95% CI 0.48–0.97), P = 0.029]. Treatment-related adverse events were more frequently observed in the Hepatectomy-TACE group, although these were generally mild and manageable. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events in both groups were neutropenia and liver dysfunction. Hepatectomy followed by adjuvant TACE is an appropriate option after radical resection in HCC patients with solitary tumor ≥ 5 cm and MVI, with acceptable toxicity.
机译:肝癌(HCC)孤立性肿瘤和微血管浸润(MVI)患者根治性切除后辅助治疗的最佳策略尚存争议。该试验评估了肝切除术与单独肝切除术在≥5 cm且MVI的HCC患者中进行肝切除术与单独肝切除术之间的辅助性经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)的有效性和安全性。在这项随机,开放标签的III期试验中,将具有≥5cm的孤立肿瘤和MVI的HCC患者随机分配(1:1),以在肝切除术(Hepatectomy-TACE)或肝切除术后接受1-2个周期的辅助性TACE单独(单独进行肝切除术)。主要终点是无病生存期(DFS)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)和不良事件。在2009年6月1日至2012年12月31日期间,共有250例患者被随机分为肝切除术-TACE组(n = 125)或单独肝切除术组(n = 125)。两组之间的临床病理特征是平衡的。随机分组的中位随访时间为37.5个月[四分位数范围18.3–48.2个月]。肝切除术-TACE组的中位DFS明显长于肝切除术单独组[17.45个月(95%置信区间[CI] 11.99–29.14))和9.27个月(95%CI 6.05–13.70),危险比[HR ] = 0.70(95%CI 0.52-0.95),P = 0.020]。肝切除术-TACE组的中位OS也比单独肝切除术组显着更长[44.29个月(95%CI 25.99–62.58)与22.37个月(95%CI 10.84–33.91),HR = 0.68(95%CI 0.48–0.97),P = 0.029]。在肝切除术-TACE组中,与治疗相关的不良事件更为常见,尽管这些症状通常较轻且易于控制。两组中最常见的3级或4级不良事件是中性粒细胞减少和肝功能障碍。肝切除后辅助TACE是在HCC患者根治术孤肿瘤≥5厘米,MVI,具有可接受的毒性后的适当选项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号