...
首页> 外文期刊>The World Economy >Wage Inequality in the United Kingdom: Trade and/or Technology?
【24h】

Wage Inequality in the United Kingdom: Trade and/or Technology?

机译:英国的工资不平等:贸易和/或技术?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The econometric literature on the wage-trade debate of the 1990s in the United Kingdom and the United States focused on globalisation and technology as the alternative causes of the skill premium, by examining manufacturing data only. The thesis of this paper is that sector-biased technical change can be considered as a further or probably as the main cause of the increasing skill premium, if skill-intensive services such as financial, insurance and communication services are taken into account. Needless to say, the growth of these sectors has been exponential in the last twenty years. In addition, if technical change is imported, then the distinction between globalisation and technology as alternative causes of the increasing wage gap loses its importance. The worldwide development of information technology, the growth in electronics, and the expansion of both foreign direct investment and the trade volume in intermediate inputs all suggest that globalisation and technology are part of the same phenomenon, which has heralded a new era of development for nations and has to be examined further.
机译:关于英国和美国1990年代工资贸易辩论的计量经济学文献,仅通过研究制造数据,就把全球化和技术作为技能溢价的替代原因集中于此。本文的论点是,如果考虑到诸如金融,保险和通讯服务等技能密集型服务,则部门偏见的技术变革可被视为导致技能溢价增加的另一个原因,或者可能是主要原因。不用说,这些行业的增长在过去的20年中呈指数级增长。此外,如果引入技术变革,那么全球化和技术之间的区别(即导致工资差距扩大的替代原因)就失去了重要性。信息技术的全球发展,电子产品的增长以及外国直接投资的增加以及中间投入品的贸易量都表明,全球化和技术是同一现象的一部分,这预示着国家发展的新时代并且需要进一步检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号